On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 17:31, Tom wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:06:44PM +0800, Isaac To wrote:
> > rather far from changing anything in the kernel memory. Andreas is
> > definitely right that the hole doesn't look like that it is that dangerous.
>
> It messed up your life for a couple weeks.
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 21:52, David Z Maze wrote:
> "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> >> me too! any package that doesn't build on m68k or arm is broken and
> >> needs to be fixed, even if it works on x86 by chance!
2 matches
Mail list logo
