Re: Re: I hereby resign as secretary

2008-12-19 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:47:50AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > project atmosphere. The only way we can "get things back on track" > and re-focus our energy on the real reason we are all here... to > create a free operating system... I believe that part of the problem is that we are not all he

Re: Canonical and Debian

2005-06-08 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:55:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > both because the overhead of > training and coordinating with inexperienced (or, well, inept) coordinators > is often higher than just doing all the work yourself, In the short term this is true, but if the amount of work is incr

Re: status of buildds?

2005-03-15 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:51:23PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > The s390 porting team can perfectly well do what the hurd-i386 porting > team does: build them themselves. I mean, umm, you don't have to be > hooked into w-b to upload packages. I believe the wanna-build admins don't want

Packages-arch-specific update

2003-09-02 Thread Ian Lynagh
Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] the best place to e-mail to get the latest version of Packages-arch-specific in CVS (with some GHC changes) to be used? Thanks Ian, curious as to why debian-autobuild was killed

Re: FTBFS: architecture all packages

2003-08-21 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > I also like the idea of rebuilding packages with newer versions of > their build-depends (or tool-chain) when a buildd is idle. That too > would require a more automatic handling of maybe-successfull builds > that won't be u

Re: telnet98_98.02.16.orig.tar.gz is wrong

1999-05-21 Thread Ian Lynagh
no-one has yet taken it over. Should I upload to fix the problem and change the maintainer to Debian QA at the same time? -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ Two most common elements in the universe: Hydrogen & Stupidity.

Re: Release Plans (1999-05-10)

1999-05-12 Thread Ian Lynagh
ed into the archive. However, at least two packages >> should get into the archive before the freeze libgtop1 and libghttp1. > >These are installed now. I assume the delay with libgtop1 was that it was a new package? If so, please remove libgtop0. Thanks -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PR

Re: gtop

1998-10-13 Thread Ian Lynagh
o it's >not likely to meet the freeze date. Yes :-( Any hints gratefully received... -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ Don't you just hate rhetorical questions?

Re: gtop and slink?

1998-10-11 Thread Ian Lynagh
#x27;ll have it done for the freeze :-( -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name at a Swiss bank.

Re: intent to package

1998-10-03 Thread Ian Lynagh
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ivan Stojic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Telnet98 I've already taken that one. Sorry :-( -- Ian Lynagh - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/ My poor mouse only has one ball.

Re: Copyrights and licenses

1998-10-02 Thread Ian Lynagh
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes >Ian Lynagh writes: >> So is it free or non-free? > >If the algorithm isn't patented you can do what ever you want with it, >regardless of what the inventor says. OK, that just leaves two questions answered -