Re: github repo with submodules: non usable source tarball

2025-06-28 Thread Hugh McMaster
On 26/06/2025 11:45 pm, Jerome BENOIT wrote: On a up-to-date Sid schroot environment, the following `watch` file 8><--- version=4 opts=mode=git,gitmode=shallow,gitmodules,date=%Y%m%d,pretty=0.0+git%cd.%h,pgpmo

Re: github repo with submodules: non usable source tarball

2025-06-25 Thread Hugh McMaster
On 25/06/2025 5:38 pm, Jerome BENOIT wrote: I am considering to package a software stored at GitHub. It is under active development and it builds well in Sid. However it appears that its source tarball at GitHub does not contain all the necessary material: its submodules are not included. This is

Bug#1069829: ITP: python-samsung-mdc -- Samsung Multiple Display Control

2024-04-25 Thread Hugh McMaster
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hugh McMaster X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-samsung-mdc Version : 1.12.1 Upstream Contact: Victor Gavro * URL : https://pypi.org/project/python-samsung-mdc * License : BSD-3-Clause

Bug#1053697: ITP: rsgain -- ReplayGain 2.0 loudness normalizer

2023-10-08 Thread Hugh McMaster
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hugh McMaster X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: rsgain Version : 3.4 Upstream Contact: complexlogic * URL : https://github.com/complexlogic/rsgain * License : BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause

Bug#1051779: ITP: docopt-ng -- command-line arguments parser (python3)

2023-09-12 Thread Hugh McMaster
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hugh McMaster X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: docopt-ng Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Contact: Nick Crews * URL : https://jazzband.co/projects/docopt-ng * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Branden, On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:08, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > Hi Hugh, > > [...] > So whether the man page is hand-crafted or generated from some other > format at build time is not relevant. In fact, it's _meta_ irrelevant > (if that's even a thing) because the only reason (apart from

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 09:10, Colin Watson wrote: > > Your problem is that you need this line as the very first line of the > page to instruct man(1) to run the tbl preprocessor: > > '\" t > > See https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/man-db/man.1.en.html#DEFAULTS That does the trick. Thank you!

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 03:39, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > This all seems promising. Unfortunately, the man page is hand-crafted, > > not generated from another source, so groff is never invoked, and no >

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Branden, On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 00:30, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > Hi Hugh, > > I work on groff upstream. Perfect :-) > At 2023-08-15T22:46:30+1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor > > failed, or it or soelim was n

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Colin, On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 23:55, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 10:46:30PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > Lintian has recently started emitting this groff warning for ftlint.1 > > in freetype-demos as part of its man pages check: > > > > grof

groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-15 Thread Hugh McMaster
Lintian has recently started emitting this groff warning for ftlint.1 in freetype-demos as part of its man pages check: groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE macro called with TW register undefined) It seems TW i

Re: Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Sven, On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 01:13, Sven Joachim wrote: > > On 2023-07-16 22:38 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > > I will be removing the transitional package libfreetype6-dev (from the > > source package freetype) later this year. > > > > [snip] > > My

Re: Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Simon, On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 00:07, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 22:38:20 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > Currently, there are 219 build-dependencies and 29 (direct) > > dependencies on libfreetype6-dev, which has been released with > > bullseye a

Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi, I will be removing the transitional package libfreetype6-dev (from the source package freetype) later this year. Currently, there are 219 build-dependencies and 29 (direct) dependencies on libfreetype6-dev, which has been released with bullseye and bookworm. I plan to file bugs with severity

Re: Testing migrations not updating or visible

2020-07-01 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 04:02, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 30-06-2020 17:01, Scott Talbert wrote: > > Looks like the problem is not with the PTS but with britney, which seems > > to not have run in a couple of days: > > https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html > > From #debian-release on IR

Testing migrations not updating or visible

2020-06-30 Thread Hugh McMaster
The package tracker is no longer displaying migration status or ‘excuses’ for packages. I expected xmlstarlet to have almost migrated, but it’s stuck on 3 days old. Other packages are not displaying any migration status, despite being uploaded recently. Hugh

Re: Bits from the Release Team: buster freeze update

2019-04-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Jonathan, On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 7:38 am, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > At the time of writing 150 release-critical bugs affect buster. This is the > number which needs to reach zero before the release can take place. What’s the easiest way to get a list of these RC bugs? Hugh

Re: Mass bug filing for the removal of freetype-config and freetype.m4

2018-02-05 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Simon, On Friday, 2 February 2018 11:14 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 at 11:07:42 +0000, Hugh McMaster wrote: >> Freetype-config has been considered deprecated for several years [1]. > > By us, or by upstream? Both. We considered freetype-config a deprecated l

Re: Mass bug filing for the removal of freetype-config and freetype.m4

2018-02-02 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Friday, 2 February 2018 12:15 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > Will you be asking upstream to remove it too? I hadn't considered that, but it might be a good idea. Why do you ask?

Mass bug filing for the removal of freetype-config and freetype.m4

2018-02-01 Thread Hugh McMaster
--- I realise removing freetype-config may not be popular. However, the long-term benefits will outweigh any short-term inconvenience. -- Hugh McMaster [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642354 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871470 [3] https://bugs.