Re: Question about libcdda_paranoia

> Look at the debian dir of the package you are backporting. ;) > Hint - k3b-0.9/debian/patches/02_k3bcdparanoialib.dpatch My fault: i did not do a backport. I just build a woody package from pure upstream sources... But thank you for the hint. Henning

Re: Question about libcdda_paranoia

On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:27, Colin Watson wrote: > No, plain .so links are only needed for build-time linking, and > therefore live in development packages. Thank you for that information! But now i am in a bit of trouble: i packaged a woody backport of k3b. This programm tries to dlopen

Question about libcdda_paranoia

Hi! I wonder why there is a symbolic link /usr/lib/libcdda_paranoia.so -> libcdda_paranoia.so.0.9.8 in package 'libcdparanoia0-dev'. Shouldn't that be in 'libcdparanoia0'? Regards Henning

apt-get problem

Hi! I posted this on debian-user, but did not receive any answer. Maybe it's a bigger problem? I hope, that somebody can help me: On the system of a friend of me, apt-get is unable to 'upgrade'. It recommends the use of 'apt-get -f install'. Here's the output: snip # apt-get -f install

favicon resource

Hi! I was just looking for a 'open use' debian favicon. But i can't find it on http://www.debian.org/logos/index.en.html Is it ok to use the resource from http://www.debian.org/favicon.ico ? Shouldn't it also be published on the logo page? Regards Henning