Re: POSIX capabilities patch

es require patching e2fsprogs too, though. -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg http://gdmxml.fugal.net/ | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach -

Re: POSIX capabilities patch

* Francesco P. Lovergine [Wed, 12 Nov 2003 at 14:48 +0100] > It has implication for libcap* packages too, doesn't it? I would assume so. -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg http://gdmxml.f

Re: POSIX capabilities patch

. Which is why I ask if it would not be appropriate as a Debian package. I am not a security expert, but OTOH people that want this functionality will manually patch anyway. My question is, is it appropriate to make it easier for them by creating a Debian package? -- Hans Fugal

POSIX capabilities patch

docs/faq.php#a5 2. http://www.tml.hut.fi/~tilmonen/givertcap/ 3. http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/kernel-2.4/capfaq-0.2.txt -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg http://g

Re: x48

The patch is quite simple [1], and you can grab a patched version at http://students.cs.byu.edu/~fugalh/x48-041f.tar.gz 1. search for "x48 patch fugal" on google groups. * Uwe Steinmann [Mon, 29 Sep 2003 at 09:07 +0200] > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 07:38:28AM -0600, Hans Fugal wr

x48

ing a package for a fine but mostly-unmaintained piece of software that does its job, when I myself have minimal familiarity with the code (or the HP48 processor itself)? -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby,

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

figuration, (although it certainly could be localhost) then it does indeed change the way I do things and add a configuration step when I set up a new system. -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg http:/

Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

ht be slightly confused by the mutt way of doing things but that doesn't mean we have to patch mutt for their sakes. Naturally, it's up to the package maintainer how to differ from upstream, but this mutt user would be miffed. -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputa

Re: Bug#202869: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?

argument rests on the former. -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg http://gdmxml.fugal.net/ | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach - GnuPG

Re: Bug#200355: ITP: csound -- incredibly powerful and versatile software synthesis program

* Florian Weimer [Mon, 7 Jul 2003 at 20:05 +0200] > Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Package name: csound > > > * License : LGPL > > Do you have any background information on the relicensing? Yes, I do: http://agentcities.cs.b

Re: Bug#200355: ITP: csound -- incredibly powerful and versatile software synthesis program

S, OR MODIFICATIONS. */ IANAL, but with the exception of the Scanned Synthesis Opcodes files the licenses seem to conform to the DFSG. -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg http://gdmx

Re: Bug#200355: ITP: csound -- incredibly powerful and versatile software synthesis program

d I now notice that their messages and my replies were not addressed to the list. I agree completely and the package will have a different short description as well as a better long description. Thank You -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/

Bug#200355: ITP: csound -- incredibly powerful and versatile software synthesis program

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-07 Severity: wishlist * Package name: csound Version : 4.23f04 Upstream Author : John ffitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/csound/ * License : LGPL Description : incredibl