Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
Hi all,
On 06/07/2009 03:59 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
really don't want to take over the package without interaction with Thomas.
But I'm definitly interesting in helping out with this package, maybe in a team
as Vincent Bernat suggested in an other mail.
Maybe
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering about how far are we with implementing a RT kernel in
Debian... Some progress here? Would be nice.
The patch I created that "fits" on Debian's vanilla kernel creates
conflicts on the sources with the Debian patches.
I hope to be abl
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering about how far are we with implementing a RT kernel in
Debian... Some progress here? Would be nice.
The patch I created that "fits" on Debian's vanilla kernel creates
conflicts on the sources with the Debian patches.
I hope to be able to c
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering about how far are we with implementing a RT kernel in
Debian... Some progress here? Would be nice.
The patch I created that "fits" on Debian's vanilla kernel creates
conflicts on the sources with the Debian patches.
I hope to be able to c
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
[your To: header was strange, maybe my mail reaches less recipents than
your's]
To get some progress here, I'm searching for a person who wants and
is capable in filing a wishlist bug (with a patch vs. the package
linux-2.6
Maybe providing a p
Felipe Sateler wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Grammostola Rosea schrieb:
But that doesn't really solve the problem imo. The problem is solved
when Ardour in unstable hit testing and then stable after a while.
Now it seems to be stuck in uns
Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Grammostola Rosea schrieb:
But that doesn't really solve the problem imo. The problem is solved
when Ardour in unstable hit testing and then stable after a while.
Now it seems to be stuck in unstable...
You don't seem to understand the Debian release poli
Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
I guess there are multimedia users out there who care much about a
stable system, reproducible results and have to earn some money from
their work - so they do not want to deal with unforseable changes.
Please do not advertise testing as a release which is read
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Cassiel wrote:
debian stable aims to production servers,
That's wrong. Debian stable aims at production systems. If your
arguing would be true I wonder why stable contains applications like
Openoffice.org or audio pl
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Cassiel wrote:
debian stable aims to production servers,
That's wrong. Debian stable aims at production systems. If your
arguing would be true I wonder why stable contains applications like
Openoffice.org or audio players or ...
IMO multimedia us
Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi Vincent,
|--==> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:31:38 +0100, Vincent Danjean
said:
VD> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>>I read this on the Debian multimedia mailinglist:
>>>Unfortunately lenny was already freezed by that time, and although
>>>
Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Why only in 64studio and not in plain Debian?
What's good for Debian is good for us :-) but the Debian project may
not want to tweak the kernel or the FireWire stack just for the
benef
Kushal Koolwal wrote:
About 6 months back I had done some extensive benchmarking on real-time kernels
applying RT patch to Debian stock kernel on x86 architecture.
I read about call for help in maintaining,testing debian rt kernel here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-users&m=123808104027590&w=2
9/3/26 Adrian Knoth mailto:a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>>
>
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:05:32PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is an realtime kernel and a proper configuration
for music
> > > produ
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Grammostola Rosea writes:
Could you comment on this? I think it's the best when Ardour will hit
Lenny.
New packages are not in scope of the update policy of released debian
versions. So this is not going to happen.
Second option is as a Lenny bac
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
taste they need to be informed what to choose from. It's like a
restaurant
where you choose from a menu. Currently we are lacking a complete
multimedia
"menu" in Debian.
An menu entry for multimedia so
taste they need to be informed what to choose from. It's like a
restaurant
where you choose from a menu. Currently we are lacking a complete
multimedia
"menu" in Debian.
An menu entry for multimedia sounds good to me
(Ubuntu has an menu entry for 'multimedia production:
Vincent Danjean wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
I read this on the Debian multimedia mailinglist:
Unfortunately lenny was already freezed by that time, and although
both of the above updates were really safe (IMO) and despite all the
efforts I and especially Reinhard put into
Hi,
Now we're talking about improving Debian for multimedia, realtime
kernels and the like, I thought let's make some work on more things to
overcome some dissadvantages of Debian for audio production compared to
other distro's.
Why is such a core app and also beautiful app as Ardour is, not
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, nescivi wrote:
Given that there are several audio oriented distributions based on
Debian
(e.g. 64studio and pure:dyne) that would benefit from this, and I am
sure
their teams may be interested in helping to support it too.
IMHO it makes perfectly se
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Do you really need real time kernel?
Debian is a technical driven project, but reading the previous two
quotes,
"real time" is used as marketing thing.
It's good to question the use of any fe
Jim wrote:
Grammostola Rosea,
I want also to direct your attention to the kernel, as it has the
possibility to be more supportive of those specific needs, by having
low latency and real-time extensions patched and enabled. The debian
folks (especially "waldi" aka Bastien Blank will s
Michael Hanke wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
As an additional hint the multimedia team might consider using the Debian Pure
Blends framework which enables them to show quite simply what is just there and
what they are working on (for instance see
Hi,
Since a while I'm pretty active in using Debian/Linux for Multimedia
production, especially focusing on music production (check
www.linuxmusicians.com for instance).
Debian is a great system to use for this. Unfortunately there are
nice music production applications which are not in
Hi,
I reported approximately 6 bugs, which where actually RFP. I reported
those as wishes, not as RFP.
For example: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520241
Can I change it? How?
\r
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:34:37AM +0100, rosea wrote:
> Package: minicomp
Hi,
I want to build packages for Debian. I'm running a debian
testing/unstable mix, but the packages should be build in Sid right?
How should I do it? I've seen a lot of different tools/ways on the
web... please give me some clear information and good references.
I've also just setup a apt-
I tried to start Xephyr:
debian-live$ Xephyr :1 -screen 1024x768 -ac
Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic, removing
from list!
Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled,
removing from list!
Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts
27 matches
Mail list logo
