Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2013-12-04 Thread Graham Whaley
On 4 December 2013 07:32, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > Does it have IPMI, LOM/DRAC/ILO/some sort of remote management or is all > that serial console + networked power switch? I suspect Debian would be > more interested in the 3A 2001 server, any idea about cost for that? > (And same question for

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2013-12-03 Thread Graham Whaley
On 3 December 2013 12:31, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello Aron, > > 2013/12/3 Aron Xu : > > On Tuesday, December 3, 2013, Hector Oron wrote: > > >> Debian is currently being bitten by MIPS chinese prototype boards that > >> behave unreliably and are hard to replace. > >> I, personally, think that bein

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2013-12-02 Thread Graham Whaley
Hi. As Aron says, the Loongson 3A boards may offer us some solution here, for mipsel anyhow, and maybe that offers us a mid-term solution for mips(be) whilst I work on other hardware options. The Loongson 3A CPU patches are 'in flight' over at linux-mips.org I believe. We will be testing the stab

Re: MIPS64EL rootfs available for use and test

2013-11-15 Thread Graham Whaley
On 14 November 2013 18:54, David Daney wrote: > On 11/14/2013 03:31 AM, Graham Whaley wrote: > [...] > > Hi David, >> out of interest, do you know if there are any commercially (ideally >> easily and cheaply ;-) available boards out there that can run Octeon >>

Re: MIPS64EL rootfs available for use and test

2013-11-15 Thread Graham Whaley
9572 > ? > > OK, will do. I'll let you know how we get on. If somebody else is/was thinking of trying it out then please still do :-) Graham > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Graham Whaley > wrote: > > > > On 14 November 2013 00:46, David Daney > wrote: &

Re: MIPS64EL rootfs available for use and test

2013-11-14 Thread Graham Whaley
On 14 November 2013 00:46, David Daney wrote: > On 11/13/2013 04:32 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:03 AM, David Daney >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/11/2013 09:57 AM, YunQiang Su wrote: >>> Hi, folks, In the recent days, I figure out the mips64el rootfs and tes

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Graham Whaley
On 29 October 2013 13:34, Aron Xu wrote: > > It would require much more resource to spend on making more ports, > this means more build machines and man power, which is not sufficient > at mean time. > > True. I hopefully have some resource coming online, and I may also have some in-house build h

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Graham Whaley
On 29 October 2013 13:40, Aron Xu wrote: > > What we are running isn't any of them, and the 2-way server board > looks promising. > > Thanks both. OK, so I've no details from Loongson about the boards they have for me yet either - I suspect it may be the same as your board. What we need to consi

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Graham Whaley
On 29 October 2013 11:50, YunQiang Su wrote: [snip] > > Nice. Can I ask which board that is? I have some boards reserved for me > in > > Loongson that I am highly likely to purchase, and suspect (but would > like to > > confirm) that they are the same board that you are using. I will also > check

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Graham Whaley
On 25 October 2013 17:22, YunQiang Su wrote: > After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port > almost done. > Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully. > The current build status can be found in http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/ > Hey! - well done. That's qui