on Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:30:26AM +0200, Wesley J. Landaker wrote about Re:
And now for something completely different... etch!:
> I don't often customize runlevels very much, but usually the first thing
> I
> do when I install a Debian system is remove all the xdm's from 2 and 3
> and
> add th
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:27:25PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> If our goal is to advance the cause of a Free operating system, then why
> >> should we be including, in our OPERATING SYSTEM, images that serve no
> >> useful purpose, and instead alienate millions or billions of people
> >> worldwi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:05:30PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:08:30PM +0200, Frank Lenaerts wrote:
> >...
> > As base is quite small, it could be released more frequently. The not
> > base part could evolve independent from the base part.
&
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:09:01AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:19:25PM +0200, Sander Smeenk wrote:
> > The same happened with one of my packages: snort. There was a /really/
> > old release in stable, because new uploads didn't make it in time. There
>
on Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:20:49PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote about Re:
Dock Apps packaging, round 2:
> I agree there is a problem with how we currently deal with our packages and
> the archive. But it is a techical problem requiring a technical solution.
> Making a few bundle packages
5 matches
Mail list logo
