mber.
What number do you suggest?
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 11:39 AM Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2025-05-03 at 11:16 +0200, Erik Schulz wrote:
> > I suspect that compliance with GDPR would require the data to be
> > stored minimally.
> > It seems reasonable to m
I suspect that compliance with GDPR would require the data to be
stored minimally.
It seems reasonable to me that a 24-hour window would reduce most
repeat-downloads.
If you stream the request log and reduce to (ip,package,version), it
will be minimal.
I think it would fit into memory, e.g. 10 mill
> misguided popularity
I would argue a more objective description is that the measurement has bias.
I.e.
- repeat-download bias.
- external-download bias, when using mirrors.
- false-download bias, when malicious actors try to manipulate the
value, for example using many IPs.
I agree that install
I'm interested in package popularity. I'm aware of popcon
(https://popcon.debian.org/), but I'm more interested in actual
downloads.
Do the debian mirrors track unique downloads (e.g. by hashed IP
address), and if no, why not? I can understand the privacy argument,
but arguably package downloads a
4 matches
Mail list logo
