Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interestingly the size is highly dependent on the architecture:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l postrm-*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ballombe ballombe 6960782 Jan 30 14:10 postrm-amd64
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ballombe ballombe 266065 Jan 30 14:09 postrm-i386
> [EMAIL PROTE
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The only (very minor) drawback is that above haskell scripts when
> compiled is about 7MB in size, but the huge gain in reliability
I think you're somewhat joking about using Haskell, but your script
weights:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ ls -lh a.out
-rwx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Jan 19, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Merging that into Debian would mean that udev would replace some
>> ifupdown planned functionality.
> Wrong.
I think that ifupdown maintainers are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Jan 19, Davide Natalini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> udev now can rename the interfaces, because they haven't a name yet.
> udev still loads the modules, you just have been lucky.
> This is not a solution in any way.
Maybe network interface renamin
Hello!
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.18.1254
> +0100]:
>> As far as I can tell, network interface names are given by the
>> kernel and they've nothing to do with udev.
>&
Davide Natalini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all
> I'm trying to get static naming for my network interfaces with udev,
> without success.
As far as I can tell, network interface names are given by the kernel
and they've nothing to do with udev.
To get a stable naming you should use some pac
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I have to, I will also continue to host the backport APT repository,
> although I would prefer not to.
Wouldn't this be a good candidate for volatile.debian.net?
Regards,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Paolo Pantaleo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have spent some time to write the bash completion for apt-file command.
> I have written a pair of email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i didn't get any
> response. Now i want to submit a patch for bash_completion file that
> add the apt-file support.
[EMA
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I have found the exim-4 packages to be extremely well organized and
handy. I used to use the "one-file" method, and was simply delighted
when I found how easy it was to switch and tweak the individual files
that I needed to when I had to create a more complicated mail se
El jue, 07-10-2004 a las 09:52 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen escribiÃ:
> * Duncan Findlay
>
> | On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > * martin f krafft
> | >
> | > | What do you think?
> | >
> | > API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
10 matches
Mail list logo