Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?

2006-01-30 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Interestingly the size is highly dependent on the architecture: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l postrm-* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 ballombe ballombe 6960782 Jan 30 14:10 postrm-amd64 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 ballombe ballombe 266065 Jan 30 14:09 postrm-i386 > [EMAIL PROTE

Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?

2006-01-29 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only (very minor) drawback is that above haskell scripts when > compiled is about 7MB in size, but the huge gain in reliability I think you're somewhat joking about using Haskell, but your script weights: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ ls -lh a.out -rwx

Re: udev naming problems for eth*

2006-01-19 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Jan 19, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Merging that into Debian would mean that udev would replace some >> ifupdown planned functionality. > Wrong. I think that ifupdown maintainers are

Re: udev naming problems for eth*

2006-01-19 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Jan 19, Davide Natalini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> udev now can rename the interfaces, because they haven't a name yet. > udev still loads the modules, you just have been lucky. > This is not a solution in any way. Maybe network interface renamin

Re: udev naming problems for eth*

2006-01-18 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Hello! martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.18.1254 > +0100]: >> As far as I can tell, network interface names are given by the >> kernel and they've nothing to do with udev. >&

Re: udev naming problems for eth*

2006-01-18 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Davide Natalini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all > I'm trying to get static naming for my network interfaces with udev, > without success. As far as I can tell, network interface names are given by the kernel and they've nothing to do with udev. To get a stable naming you should use some pac

Re: Someone to take over XMTLV packages

2005-09-28 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I have to, I will also continue to host the backport APT repository, > although I would prefer not to. Wouldn't this be a good candidate for volatile.debian.net? Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: how to make a patch

2005-09-07 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Paolo Pantaleo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have spent some time to write the bash completion for apt-file command. > I have written a pair of email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i didn't get any > response. Now i want to submit a patch for bash_completion file that > add the apt-file support. [EMA

Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

2005-02-17 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: I have found the exim-4 packages to be extremely well organized and handy. I used to use the "one-file" method, and was simply delighted when I found how easy it was to switch and tweak the individual files that I needed to when I had to create a more complicated mail se

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

2004-10-07 Thread Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias
El jue, 07-10-2004 a las 09:52 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen escribiÃ: > * Duncan Findlay > > | On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | > * martin f krafft > | > > | > | What do you think? > | > > | > API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.