Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

2003-10-06 Thread Dylan Thurston
On 2003-10-06, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:54:09PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > Because it is the only thing I could find that reflects Debian's >> > take on security fixes: feature backports are to be avoided. >> >> That's because it's the position of

Re: Annoyances of aptitude (Was: Where are we now?) (Was: Bits from the RM)

2003-10-04 Thread Dylan Thurston
On 2003-10-03, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see. It's a lot simpler, from the point of view of maintainability, > to have a single user's manual for both offline and online perusal. > > One nice way to make this less of an issue would be to rewrite the > documentation in a str