On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 04:20:00PM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020417 14:29]:
> > this "Brandon" person is that you're talking about, and what the heck
>
> Don't worry, I also had a lapse of judgement eariler in the thread.
>
> --
> Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:16:26PM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> I don't see how we can be sure that you (the new-key owner) are you (the
> old-key owner).
>
> As I understand it, this kind of "chain of establishment" can only work
> if you sign your new key with your old one. But IIUC you lost
OK, folks.
For the purposes of consistency, I've signed the old lost key with the new
key and posted both keys to the keyservers. I've put the old lost key
(Just the public key export of it of course) on
linuxnewbie.codecastle.com, devel.codecastle.com, and
admin.codecastle.com in the my_public_ke
Evening ladies and gents,
got a file here that's set suid root as a tty device.
$ dpkg -S /dev/ptmx
dpkg: /dev/ptmx not found
$
doing a
$ grep ptmx -r /var/lib/dpkg/ | less
$
shows the tetex-base tetex-extra packages and their font ins
Hey folks,
Forgive the email. I had an accident on my machine which
wiped out my gpg keyring. Unfortuantely I had not had time
to back up the ring, thus the gpg key I've been using is
completely lost.
I have since made a new key. the **correct** gpg key is as follo
* Pierfrancesco Caci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Nice bait I'll bite, but if you want to read it you'll have to
> subscribe... It's not fair to throw the rock and hide the hand
>
> 1) learn how to properly format a mail message (i.e. fold at 75th
>column)
Quit pickin at the measly st
6 matches
Mail list logo
