Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?

Ian Campbell wrote: On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 11:32 +0200, Daniel Widenfalk wrote: Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 14:16 +0200, Daniel Widenfalk wrote: Ok, so dropping back a step. Let's assume that I build the 3.2.0 XEN hypervisor and dom0 kernel using 2.6.18 as base. I s

Re: subversion 1.5.0 in experimental

ble with earlier clients! For merge info to be fully supported you'll need to update your repositories manually using svnadmin or some other method, e.g. dumping and reloading the repository. Regards /Daniel Widenfalk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?

Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 14:16 +0200, Daniel Widenfalk wrote: Ok, so dropping back a step. Let's assume that I build the 3.2.0 XEN hypervisor and dom0 kernel using 2.6.18 as base. I should then be able to build domU kernel(s) using the linux-source-2.6.25 files

Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?

> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:37:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've been trying (with absolutely no success) to build XEN kernels using >> the 2.6.25 kernel source tree. I've got 10 domU's and 2 dom0 that I want >> to upgrade. >> >> I've done >> >> $ apt-get install linux-tre

Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future.

Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:24:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:04:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: The fact you don't have anyone able to make a working cross-compiler speaks somewhat poorly of the support available for the m68k toolchain, to