Hello,
On 17.10.2012 11:13, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> 2012/10/17 Hideki Yamane :
>> No, LP is good website for development with collaboration.
>
> Can I have my own LP, please?
https://dev.launchpad.net/Running should help you with that.
Have a great day,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Am Donnerstag, den 23.11.2006, 07:45 +0100 schrieb Daniel Holbach:
> Hello Florian,
Sorry everybody. I woke up too early today to recognize the forced
Reply-To.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Hello Florian,
Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 17:17 + schrieb Florian Ragwitz:
> jokosher (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream release.
>* Update 10_desktop_file for 0.2.
>* Location of installed files changed slightly.
> + Modify debian/jokosher.sh and debian/jok
Hello everybody,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2006, 17:40 +0100 schrieb Luca Capello:
> 2) will the package be based on the unofficial Debian (but official
>Ekiga) snapshot available at [1]?
it'd make a lot of sense to do this together with the pkg-voip group.
They already prepared packages for opa
Hello,
Am Freitag, den 30.12.2005, 08:35 +0100 schrieb Frank Lichtenheld:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:55:17PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
> > guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
Hi Nikita,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.07.2005, 12:04 +0400 schrieb Nikita V.
Youshchenko:
> > I talked to upstream and they
> > said, the ABI broke during the development unintentionally, but we
> > should better stick to libxml++2.6-2.10.0 and recompile the dependent
> > packages.
>
> Is 2.10 backwa
Hi Nikita,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.07.2005, 02:04 +0400 schrieb Nikita V.
Youshchenko:
> For one of our internal projects, libxml++2.6 was too old.
> So I've created a package for libxml++2.10, using debian/ dir for the
> latest libxml++2.6 package.
I packaged it for Ubuntu - libxml++2.6 and libxm
Hello Josselin,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 18:01 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Oh, great. I forgot that Canonical's business model is to use Ubuntu as
> an upstaging area for Debian, so that we're always lagging behind. Will
> the next development decisions also be taken by some Canonical sta
Hey Kevin,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 05:06 -0400 schrieb Kevin Mark:
> check out: http://debian.home.pipeline.com/ and look for the
> newdebian2.png for a somewhat accurate idea of how things work.
> Comments/questions welcomed.
After the first shudder at my end and the first daunting impressio
Hi Stephen,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 10:49 +0100 schrieb Stephen Birch:
> How to report bugs. Do we really need to separate bug tracking
> mechanisms?
Some Debian maintainers were really unhappy about Ubuntu bugreports and
I do completly agree with them. Some packages are compiled against
dif
Hi Andreas,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 09:17 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> My impression was that Ubuntu would directly derive
> from sid and universe would be kind of a sid mirror.
It's good to clarify some bits. In Ubuntu we have 4 repositories:
* main: the really really 18-months sup
Hey Andreas,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 09:07 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> What are the reasons for getting something easier into universe than
> sid according to your opinion?
Since we have no "package maintainers", but a big team of enthusiasts
trying to make as much cool things happen as po
Hey Adeodato,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 04:29 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> but on the
> packaging side they work as closely as possible: common VCS repository
> and whatever.
This sounds really cool.
> specially for non-experienced packagers, doesn't help here
> either (correct me
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 23:50 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>
> > But the atmosphere in the thread is tense and full of misunderstandings.
> You are right here and I love if we could solve this.
Nice you say that. :)
> >
Hi Petter,
thank you very much for that mail.
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 21:01 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> And more specificly, we are discussing how to make sure (new/not in
> debian) packages in Ubuntu also make it into Debian. I suspect we are
> under the assumtion that packages are
Hi Petter,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 20:14 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Daniel Holbach]
> > Do you have a particular case in mind?
>
> I'm not going to provide examples, no.
I'm very unhappy, about your answers and this whole thread in general.
Don't
Hi Bill,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:47 -0500 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > This is not going to work for all packages, as some package
> > maintainers are not too happy about Debian, and would only like to
> > maintain packages in Ubuntu. We need a procedure for this case as
> > well.
>
> Shou
Hey Dale,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 12:33 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz:
> When using apt-get on a system installed from the installation CD (not the
> live
> CD) apt-get points to the Ubuntu archives, which only contain a very limited
> subset of Debian's main archives. I had limited success i
Hello Dale,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:29 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz:
> >From the first CD I installed, I realized it was a fork...and a disapointing
> one at that. (Pretty desktop on live CD didn't install from installation CD,
> but the fact that their archives only hold their limited pa
Hi Petter,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 18:38 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> This is not going to work for all packages, as some package
> maintainers are not too happy about Debian, and would only like to
> maintain packages in Ubuntu. We need a procedure for this case as
> well.
Do you ha
Dear Andreas
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 12:05 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Somebody might find the appropriate term for "we do not try
> hard to search more effective ways".
I thought very highly of you, when you (as one voice of many) said
"group maintenance". I want to highlight, underlin
Dear Andreas,
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > It has been said that it is too much of a
> > burden for Debian maintainers to process the patches, and Ubuntu currently
> > has a miniscule number of developers compared to Debian.
> I wonder why the statement
>
Hey Pierre, hey everybody else,
I now quote some lines I found pretty important for the whole
discussion:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> A push method (wrt us) would be better than a pull (from us) one.
> We have not time to pull.
> we have bloate
Hello Peter, hi everybody else,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 14:08 +0200 schrieb Peter Van Eynde:
> A message like this makes you the perfect victim :-) for my question:
> what should a debian maintainer do to have his or her packages in
> universe in a good shape? I'm even willing to build the pa
Hello everybody,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 10:52 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Having the Ubuntu maintainer as co-maintainer would be a drastical
> advance for both Debian and Ubuntu.
Thanks Andreas for pointing this out. I am really happy to hear interest
in this. Since we're all working on
Hi everybody,
Am Dienstag, den 31.05.2005, 11:54 -0700 schrieb Matt Zimmerman:
> In some cases, Ubuntu maintainers are not also Debian maintainers, and as
> such would require sponsorship in order to upload their packages to Debian.
> Ubuntu, on the other hand, imports all new source packages from
26 matches
Mail list logo
