breaks too frequesntly. :)
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:09:54AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Wolfe) writes:
>
> > Actualy, I believe that the mkisofs maintainer should have seen that a
> > new option was created and notified the maintainers of anything t
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:24:06PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:14:46PM +0200, Juha J?ykk? wrote:
>
> > I wonder how this could happen in the first place: if CDRToaster
> > depended properly on mkisofs version <= whatever, then upgrading
> > mkisofs should remove CDRToas
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 11:07:20PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > Um, if it doesn't work for the version of mkisofs in woody, then it is
> > a critical bug as far as woody is concerned.
>
> That may be true. But someone who has potato installed, and
l/fringe stuff thats poping up)
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:22:42PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 03:49:11PM -0600, Brian Wolfe wrote:
> > Instead of many new packages, why not make people pick up the orphaned
> > stuff, and find replacements or adopt p
Ok, here is something to look at. How many NEW packages are there in
the last 2 months? How many of them could have been saved for later due to an
alternate allready existing? How many don't add a whole lot of value to debian?
Instead of many new packages, why not make people pic
It's a normal bug at the minimal. I couldn't get CDRToaster to even do
a simple burn of a single directory! So I think the bug description would be
more like "CDRToaster has failed to follow the evolution of mkisofs's command
line parameters. As a result many fetures that CDRToaster purp
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 01:43:53PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 01:57:17AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > As debian "caught up" on versions, CDRToaster became
> > increasingly buggy. The last modification that I saw to it over
> > a year ago was to let it s
ly Ture Open Source distro out there that I know of.
#3 It started with a noble goal in mind, and started with an attitude of
quality. If not, then where the hell did the idea of apt-get and dpkg come
from!?!
#4 Pick-o-the-week application ability. More than one editor, browser,
filemanager, g
s in Debian, not packagers that go
> their merry way leaving the distro littered with outdated and often broken
> crap.
Aye, and I as a user will wave my Clue Bat(tm) as forcefully as
required and as frequently as required at developer heads that I have
contact with that don&#x
at worst IMHO.
>
>
> Have a nice (redhat|mandrake|windowsXP) day
>
> Pf
Ack! EVIL! It's still Debian Woody for me. :) I'm not giving up just
yet.
--
Brian Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Down to earth computing!"
TerraBox.comFingerprint: 2849 5090 D4E0 2A6C C648 A750 52F8 8504 67DB 205C
Duly chastined. :) I discovered a few minutes ago (thanks to a friend
that is d-d) that I can in fact join the debian-devel list. So I am now lurking
to read and reply. :)
I'll reply in a few minutes to the other email. :)
Brian
11 matches
Mail list logo
