Re: `MIT-scsh': May it go in the main distribution?

I would suggest that this one is very close but still misses... On Wed, May 06, 1998 at 06:41:14PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: [snip] >Use of this program for non-commercial purposes is permitted provided > that such use is acknowledged both in the software itself and in > accompanying docu

Re: Bug#21969: debian-policy: needs clarification about Standards-Version

Manoj, you are really 'hitting the nail on the head' with the stuff that you have written lately (and I will admit to not necessarily recogniaing the significance of what you have written in the recent past)... On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 01:01:17AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"Raul" ==

Re: What's the storywith 2.0?

I am one of those 'not a developer, hamm users'. I have been using 1PC type and three 68k type Debian hamm boxes since sometime around the middle of last year. I am a bit frustrated with hamm right now. As of just before hamm went from 'unstable' to 'frozen' almost every upgrade on my PC box 'b