Bug#398458: ITP: kvm -- full virtualization on x86 hardware

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: kvm Version : 0.0.2 Upstream Author : Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://kvm.sourceforge.net/ * License

Bug#381427: ITP: logfilter -- a tool for performing ad-hoc filtering of apache website log files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: logfilter Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Jack Hughes, OPENXTRA Limited, John Brewer * URL : http://www.logfilter.org/ * License : Apache Description : a to

Bug#381160: ITP: autofw -- Automatic firewall script

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: autofw Version : 0.3.3 Upstream Author : Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://baruch.ev-en.org/proj/autofw/ * License : GPLv2 Description

Bug#376588: ITP: cryptomount -- a utility for accessing encrypted filesystems

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: cryptomount Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : rwpenney«AT»users«DOT»sourceforge«DOT»net * URL : http://cryptmount.sourcefor

Re: Bug#195426: O: multi-gnome-terminal -- Enhanced the GNOME Terminal

* Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030601 13:59]: > On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:01:37PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote: > > MGT is much more capable than gnome-terminal, I prefer the power of MGT > > over gnome-terminal, and if no-one else will step in, I'd be willing

Re: Bug#195426: O: multi-gnome-terminal -- Enhanced the GNOME Terminal

* Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030530 22:57]: > On pe, 2003-05-30 at 21:01, Baruch Even wrote: > > MGT is much more capable than gnome-terminal, > > I'm quite happy to believe that, but would you like to list some of the > capabilities it has that gnome-term

Re: Bug#195426: O: multi-gnome-terminal -- Enhanced the GNOME Terminal

MGT is much more capable than gnome-terminal, I prefer the power of MGT over gnome-terminal, and if no-one else will step in, I'd be willing to maintain MGT myself. I wouldn't think that any GNOME 1 program is obsolete. In this case MGT provides useful functionality and the fact that it's based on

Re: Managing package sources with subversion?

I know I've tried to keep packages in Subversion but the time stamps are not updated on export which caused problems with autoconf scripts for me. This bug is not expected to be solved for version 1.0 so I abandoned the idea for now. Baruch * Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030530 15:02

Re: Anybody interested in packaging pfaedit font editor?

There was an RFP for pfaedit (99904), which I've changed a few days ago to an ITP and prepared a package already. However I'm going to be without net connection for some (short) time now and the package still needs to be tested. I will upload it in two or three weeks (or sooner). On 3 Sep 2001, P