Daniel Burrows a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:54:16AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>>> term. I would also love to find a way in the future to interface with
>>> the aptitude dependency problem resolver (that is superiour to the one
>>> in libapt).
>> In wh
Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> Heya,
>
> actually I'm looking more for somebody who has an actual use-case for
> those plugins and is willing to test them with a recent version of gimp,
> I didn't even think about finishing the packages yet. The code is
> unmaintained for years, and the refocus under g
Hi Eric,
First I wanted to say again that whatever your final decision, a build system
that optionally does the renaming would still be appreciated. It would be even
better if the MoFo would do it themselves, of course. I'm sure some users would
feel better if they are able to ponder the risks fo
1. Completely ignore their Trademark Policy document and let MoFo come
to us if they're not happy with our use of the marks.
2. Rename Firefox and strip all trademarks out.
3. Accept MoFo's offer of Debian-specific trademark usage.
4. Try to negotiate some other arrangement with MoFo.
Why no
Hello,
this is my Very Humble (TM) opinion, as I do not have a significant
contribution to Debian.
First I have to say I understand the general spirit of the proposal.
Releasing on an architecture means making promises to the users, for
example that a significant portion of the packages in the
5 matches
Mail list logo
