Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Needed for zeromq library:
* Package name: openpgm
Version : 2.0.something
Upstream Author : Have to check this
* UR
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: zeromq
Version : 2.0~beta2 (right now)
Upstream Author : iMartix Corp.
* URL : http://www.zeromq.org/
* Li
Package: general
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heyho!
Quite an annoying bug and no idea where to start looking...
On this Atom (AOA 150; kernel, hal, udev, X mostly from sid or at least
squeeze), I have now twice (both times after several suspend/wakeup cycles)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: opticalraytracer
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Paul Lutus
* URL : http://www.arachnoid.com/Optical
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm currently investigating this perl module; I'll package it or close
or rename to RFP depending on how co
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed the pdp1Â-unix-v{5,6,7} images - how useful are they really?
popcon suggests that only a few people have installed them.
Since Kevin now orphaned them and they are non-free, can we get rid of
th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cedilla
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Juliusz Chroboczek
* URL : http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/cedilla/
* License : GPL
Description : ascii to postscript renderer with unicode support
An ascii t
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 00.19, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I think going to UTF-8 as the default locale charmap for all locales
> is a feasable goal for etch, as is recoding everything to UTF-8 (where
> it makes sense).
Yep.
My biggest problem right now is 'lpr ' to a postscript printer
(I use cup
On Sunday 05 December 2004 20.11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Any parser that acceps 8bit non-ascii chars
> will accept UTF-8 then. What remains is just making the UTF-8 chars
> visually correct then.
And make sure that, where character strings are modified, the multibyte
sequences are counted
On Thursday 02 December 2004 10.36, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:04:15PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > In Europe, cheap printing led to [...] a
> > sudden huge broadening in thought [...]
> >
> > In China, the result of the very same technology was the exact
> > opposite;
On Saturday 13 November 2004 14.53, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23.44, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > N+0 days
> > > Official security support for sarge begins
> >
> > Will th
On Sunday 14 November 2004 21.55, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Martin Schulze [2004-11-14 20:13 +0100]:
[...]
Thanks for your comments, I believe I have covered all that now.
cheers
-- vbi
(And: hey, it's a wiki, do it yourself :-)
--
Oops
pgpMIDf03LZ1t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 12 November 2004 16.16, Christoph Berg wrote:
> That leaves us with "text editor" ;-)
Debian, the distribution of a hundred window managers and a thousand text
editors...
-- vbi
--
Oops
pgptm6UpoamMe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23.44, Colin Watson wrote:
> N+0 days
> Official security support for sarge begins
Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced widely,
to get as much testing as possible? (Like: general debian-announce, press
contacts, ...)
-- vbi
--
Oop
[list policy is not to send cc:s - thank you]
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 17.00, Frank Küster wrote:
> Please do not use language like "brain-dead" in the text of this
> page.
Right - and you're too late, was already removed.
> An other point could be "Use sensible version numbering":
added, th
Hi,
I've just started http://wiki.debian.net/SoftwarePackaging, intended to
collect thoughts of packagers how upstream developers can make the life of
a packager easier.
I'm sure all packagers have wondered about "brain-dead" upstream developers
who have not put much thought into how their sof
On Thursday 04 November 2004 17.46, Otto Wyss wrote:
> Why do you keep on saying this without providing _any_ figures!
Who is "you" here? Please pay attention to attribution on mailing list
postings - especially if you're starting a new thread with your mail. I
posted this statement about cpu
On Friday 29 October 2004 01.57, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 18:08 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Thursday 28 October 2004 16.40, Matthew Garrett wrot
On Thursday 28 October 2004 16.40, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Warning: The signature is bad.
I guess this was unavoidable in a posting about a security related issue
with GnuPG...
greetings
-- vbi
--
Oops
pgpsZSnPddRmR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 09.20, Ian Bruce wrote:
> Can anyone explain why rsync is no longer considered an appropriate
> method for fetching Packages files?
IIRC the problem is that rsync is quite CPU-heavy on the servers, so while
the mirrors have the (network) resources to feed downloads to 1
On Thursday 28 October 2004 01.53, Joey Hess wrote:
> paddy wrote:
> > what about ~/Desktop and friends?
>
> I don't know if Desktop falls under the heading of being a configuration
> file or directorty. Not that I much like that directory, but like
> Maildir, it seems out of the scope of this FHS
[please remember Debian list policy: no cc:s unless requested]
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 17.54, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > But does anything warn me (linda/lintian?) when I update debconf
> > templates and/or package descriptions and forget to post to
> > debian-i18n? (which would be: it shou
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 07.41, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Again, please make your best for requesting translation updates on
> debian-i18n@lists.debian.org when introducing new templates to your
> packages or when you change some other internationalised material.
Yo!
Jujst wondering: hor mu
On Monday 25 October 2004 23.47, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> - in difference to apt-pupdate, I do not use chains of small diffs,
>based on days and managed by the server. Instead, the server provides
>the patch for a md5sum which contains the diffs between the version
>of the client and the
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 14.05, Samuel Ferrer wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I am very interested in the Debian project.
great!
> - How to install the developer package and thus be abe to use the "make"
Such user questions are properly addressed at the debian-user mailing list
instead of the develope
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 12.11, martin f krafft wrote:
> 2. apt-cacher:
> Also a very nice concept, I have found it rather unusable. Clients
> would time out as the streaming does not work reliably. Also,
> after using it for a day or two, I found 30 or more Perl zombies
> on the syste
On Monday 18 October 2004 09.54, Brian May wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a number of bugs reported against my packages which are
> actually (already reported) bugs in other packages.
Reading the rest of the thread, I conclude that adding an explanation to the
bug and tagging it wontfix is probably t
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 08.30, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 23:28, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Does it hook into ppp to handle persistent ppp connections? (i.e.
> > adsl).
>
> I am not sure what you mean.
>
> The new ifupdown uses pppd's updetach option. Run with this option,
> pp
On Monday 11 October 2004 20.24, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 11, Joerg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > why ppp provides its own mechanism of telling programs when the
> > interface is coming up or down? Many programs register for the ppp
> > mechanism, but not for the network mechanism. Wher
On Saturday 09 October 2004 21.33, Adam Majer wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >Scroll up to the top of the country list and you'll see "enter
> >information manually".
>
> Not to nitpick here, but shouldn't options like "None of the above" be
> at the end of a list? Generally, the idea of picking s
Yo!
This was discussed at length (iirc soon after woody release, in one of the
'what should be better in sarge' threads). but without any real solution
being presented.
I don't know, has there been any progress? Somebody (a DD) failed to reproduce
it. I did set up a few Debian machines recentl
[on list, this time. sorry]
On Saturday 09 August 2003 04:48, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> You can talk but you can't second a proposal. You somewhat can (or
> could) make a proposal since that isn't signed and normaly noone
> bothered to check if one was a DD. But thats more of a backdoor than
>
Not wanting to start yet another thread, but I not knowing where to tack it
on...
How about moving from the one-step application (one is non-dd or dd) two a two
stage process: introduce the 'Debian Contributor' brand with very easy entry
level, and only DC's (older than a month or something lik
On Friday 08 August 2003 05:23, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Policy changes, voting and the internal discussions all need
> membership. Having NMs hang in limbo without due cause is denying them
> the right to those.
Voting yes. But to me it seems that most issues are discussed on the open
list
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 18:42, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> Your conclusion that long DAM wait times leads to slow releases has
> little or no basis in fact. You do not need to have completed the NM
> process to contribute to Debian. In fact, I believe the whole DAM
> process would be more eff
On Monday 04 August 2003 19:08, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:27:38PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
> > > see, there's no lucidatypewriter ISO-10646 font, but I don't have all
> > > the packages installed.
>
On Monday 28 July 2003 22:31, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Currently, BTS sends weekly two mails to debian-devel-announce - one about
> WNPP and one about RC bugs.
>
> I think it will help to improve Debian quality if several more lists will
> be "broadcasted" by BTS:
[...]
> - Packages with more
On Saturday 26 July 2003 01:08, John Hasler wrote:
> No research, but I've had a couple of experiences that tend to confirm it.
> It's irrelevant, though, because people who have never used Windows or Mac
> are getting scarce.
In the industrialized world. But there's 3 billion people who have nev
On Friday 25 July 2003 18:57, Colin Watson wrote:
> Oh, konsole? No idea, as I don't use KDE. I saw your mentions of font
> problems elsewhere in this thread. Have you tried, say, uxterm with a
> known-good UTF-8 font? I use
> '-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--15-140-75-75-c-*-iso10646-1' on my work
>
On Friday 25 July 2003 13:51, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 25.07.03 um 11:43:15 schrieb Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder:
> > Hmmm. This is really funny. Look at
> > http://fortytwo.ch/~avbidder/man-page.png.
>
> Good you mention it. File a bug against gnupg. It
On Friday 25 July 2003 12:21, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:43:15AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
> > On Friday 25 July 2003 11:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > > What's a "dash"? Sorry, but you have to be more
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 25.07.03 um 10:04:26 schrieb David Pashley:
> > Probably the biggest unicode problem I have noticed is with man and/or
> > less where it can't display dashes correctly. At least it doesn't seem
> > to work out of the box.
>
> What's a "dash"?
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:04, David Pashley wrote:
> Probably the biggest unicode problem I have noticed is with man and/or
> less where it can't display dashes correctly. At least it doesn't seem
> to work out of the box.
Fully ACK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat ~/bin/man
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 14:11, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
> Is Debian aims to be unicode compatible system?
IANADD - but I guess the answer definitely is yes. But it's not a very urgent
task.
> If yes, then should I mail a bug report against packages which are not
> able to handle unicode
On Thursday 24 July 2003 17:09, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Could
> someone tell me what is actually wrong with them (apart from not
> having a more colorful interface, SCNR)? If it is totally screwed up
> under the hood, then a clean redesign is good. If its only a cosmetic
> issue, I do not see the poin
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 22:44, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:23:45PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
Bidder wrote:
> > I went through some of the older bug reports of gnupg - I'd like some
> > input whether I should act as suggested, or
Yo all!
I went through some of the older bug reports of gnupg - I'd like some input
whether I should act as suggested, or rather not. All of those bugs are more
than 1 year old.
Greetings
-- vbi
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=101502
"gnupg: gnupg uses wrong key"
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 13:14, Ignacio García Fernández wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:09:46PM +0200, Lucas Moulin wrote:
> > On mar, jui 08 09:36
> > Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Birthday
> > >
> > > Debian
> > > 10 years
> > >100 countries
> >
Thanks a lot, this is great!
On Friday 04 July 2003 10:02, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> Is it reasonable to think about some sort of localizzation support for NEWS
> file? Changes documented there might be worthy of translation.
Not about i18n, really, but please at least specify from
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 15:45, Matt Hope wrote:
> This Perl module provides an object oriented interface to access
> Revision Control System (RCS) utilities.
Is this the original rcs specifically, or revision control system utilities in
general? This is not entirely clear to me from this desc
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 17:12, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
> complained about the fact that I didn't warning about the new
> /etc/default/stunnel file introduced in package (thereis a note in
> README.Debian and in change
On Friday 27 June 2003 01:32, Millis Miller wrote:
> Description : Send email from command line, either via MTA or SMTP,
> with optional encryption
> Also, if gpg is installed, it can digitally sign and encrypt outgoing
> emails.
Just out of curiosity: inline PGP, or PGP/MIME
cheers
-- vb
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 11:51, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: debbackup
> Version : 0.1
Version 0.1...
How much of it does already work? How much is sid specific and won't work on
woody/sarge?
On Sunday 15 June 2003 17:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > What about a version _with_ all non-threaded interpreters, but _without_
> > gtk2/kde support?
>
> That would be console Vim, from either package. The GUI doesn't add so
> muc
On Monday 26 May 2003 22:30, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerfried Fuchs) wrote on 26.05.03 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As for the long descriptions, I really don't see what the use is in an
> ITP. The packages will of course have them.
A proper long description will help avoid ques
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 16:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:24:25PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Usually this is controlled by the Content-Disposition: header.
> > "Content-Disposition: inline" should be displayed inline;
> > "Content-Disposition: attachment" will often be hidd
On Tuesday 29 April 2003 16:40, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 04:32:37PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > * i486 guarantees a 32-bit external data bus (386SX has a 16-bit bus.).
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg02043.ht
> >ml Not sure if ther
Did you start a new thread on purpose? If not: please use a sensible mail
program. Also, please use proper attribution lines when replying to mail.
On Tuesday 22 April 2003 08:31, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> Just because one small feature of a magnificent piece of software is
> slightly annoying, does
On Saturday 19 April 2003 20:32, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> b) The licensing information certainly ist misleading: The first line says
>GPL 2, period. Then there's lengthy information for assigning copyright
>of patches. After that, there is that funny "nothing ... shall be
> interpreted to
On Wednesday 16 April 2003 11:11, Ayman Negm wrote:
> Description : dd_rescue does copy data from one file or block device
> to another
I guess a better Description: would be 'dd clone which ignores read errors'.
But I see in the dd man page:
conv=KEYWORDS
convert the
On Saturday 12 April 2003 18:57, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
> - Mensagem Reenviada de [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> With no restrictions or special requirements, osCommerce is able
> to run on any PHP3 or PHP4 enabled web server, on any environment
> that PHP and MySQL supports, which include
On Saturday 12 April 2003 15:34, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:57:34PM +0200, Lars Bahner wrote:
> > pptp-linux
>
> AIUI, you have to rebuild your kernel with a patch, and the version of
> the patch in the archive doesn't work on recent kernels. So I doubt
> many people will
On Friday 11 April 2003 19:52, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> Will these packages will still be available through archive.d.o or will
> they be purged from there as well?
I guess you thought about http://snapshot.debian.net/ instead of archive?
s.d.n main page explicitely says that removed pkgs will be ret
On Friday 11 April 2003 16:34, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> * Programs which access SQL databases should do so through
> libgda2/unixodbc/???.
>
> ... assuming that we can reach some sort of consensus on which library
> should be used..?
Why is a consesus needed?
I agree with you that having each p
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 02:38, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:29:38PM +0100, Aaron Isotton wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > (sorry for the overlong subject).
> >
> > I originally sent this to debian-doc but I got no answers, so I
> > thought I'd post it here too.
>
> Because debian-doc was b
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 15:25, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
> which will be re
66 matches
Mail list logo
