* Adam Heath [Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:47:39 -0500]:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It was that such package versions could not be used *before* sarge released,
> > not that they would be supported immediately *after* the release; the change
> > has not yet been made to make this poss
* Marc Haber [Thu, 09 Jun 2005 07:13:45 +0200]:
> Hi,
Hi, (cc'ing Mako, the current Planet Debian maintainer)
> as we all know, Planet Debian generates RSS feeds that Akregator
> doesn't grok, and both packages point at the other one for being at
> fault.
> Does Debian have something like an "
* Andreas Tille [Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:00:20 +0200]:
> Or is there even a hook for doing exactly what I want: Link to the doc
> directory
> of a dependant package?
I use this in amarok:
common-binary-post-install-arch::
for p in $(filter-out amarok,$(DEB_ALL_PACKAGES)); do \
* Martin Pitt [Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:22:00 +0200]:
Hello Martin,
> I already did these steps for a fair number of packages. So if you
> maintain one of the packages that have a debdiff at [3], you are lucky
> and only need to apply the patch there (however, cyrus-sasl2 and
> dovecot were nasty case
Hello,
[I'm sending this to three lists. Please only reply to -devel unless
the answer is on-topic for some of the others.]
This mail is about making people aware of how actions aimed at
improving Debian, like providing a new version of a library or NMUing
a package, can have negative e
tag 303860 patch
thanks
* Mathias Weyland [Sun, 05 Jun 2005 02:38:49 +0200]:
> Hi
Hello Mathias,
> I'm trying to solve bug #303860 but I need some help. The problem is that
> the configure script errors on sparc because it can't find the KDE
> libraries. All other architechtures build fine.
* Petter Reinholdtsen [Sat, 04 Jun 2005 21:01:58 +0200]:
> [Daniel Holbach]
Hello Petter, Daniel, let me pop in. It's my intention to be
constructive.
> I believe we are discussing how to keep the packages in Debian and
> Ubuntu as synchronized as possible,
Specifically, packages in univer
* Christoph Wegscheider [Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:37:46 +0200]:
> "The official Debian packages are built by a buildd, also called build
> daemon, which makes use of pbuilder to ensure that every package is
^^^
That bit is wrong, buildd/buildds use 'sbuild'.
* SZERVÁC Attila [Wed, 01 Jun 2005 12:35:54 +0200]:
> Sorry for irregular Bug Report, but I dont know, how can I refer
> correctly to version number in this case in a correct Bug Report, but I
> think, this is a grave (RC?) Bug.
It's "important", and it's #306809.
> Reason: stable 1.0.x Sp
* Turbo Fredriksson [Mon, 30 May 2005 12:52:54 +0200]:
> Oki, I forgot that I already uploaded a -2 version. Now, in testing
> (which this was intended for) I have -1...
> I haven't done an update like this in years, but could someone
> verify that I should take the '-1' version, do the modificat
10 matches
Mail list logo
