guess_from_environment("RPM_BUILD_NCPUS")
if not guess:
try:
guess = guess_nproc()
finally:
guess = guess or guess_python()
Additionally, the --ignore argument of nproc(1) might be of use for
this script as well.
Best regards
Ángel
On 2025-01-16 at 20:16 +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Quoting Simon Richter (2025-01-16 16:52:19)
> > atomic operations require linking against libatomic — always have..
> > Some
> > architectures inline a few functions, which is how you get away
> > with omitting
>
(it seems the forwarding broke the thread 😕)
On 2025-01-13 at 11:10 +0100, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
> > normal dist-upgrade: 1m6.561s
> > eatmydata: 0m1.911s
> > force-unsafe-io: 0m9.096s
>
> Thanks for these interesting figures. Could you please also provide
> details about the underly
On 2025-01-12 at 18:03 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Watching other people find and fix bugs, even in code they
> have written or know well, I can't trust systems built on modern
> Markov chains to do better, no matter how much input you give them, and
> that's without crediting LLMs as able to
Resending without the attachments, since the mailing list seems to have
fully eaten the message, rather than just delaying it until a moderator
approval, as I originally thought.
Forwarded Message
From: Ángel
To: debian-devel
Subject: Re: A 2025 NewYear present: make dpkg
On 2024-12-20 at 11:42 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Maybe it would be more productive to take the preference disagreement as
> given and then try to figure out how to proceed given that we're never
> going to all agree on the best way of handling configuration files? Is
> there some way that we can
On 2024-12-22 at 08:37 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Maybe our conffile handling should be modified to automatically
> accept comment-only changes to dpkg-conffiles.
>
> Greetings
> Marc
That would require to tag what is considered a comment for each
conffile.
While most config files seem to use a
On 2025-01-02 at 17:11 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 02.01.2025 03:00, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
>
> > Sure but I wouldn’t know how to do that since I’m calling apt and
> > force-unsafe-io seems to be a dpkg option ?
>
> echo force-unsafe-io > /etc/dpkg/dpkg.conf.d/unsafeio
>
> before upgrade.
>
On 2023-02-26 at 18:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 07:39:09AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > As Jonas mentions, including the years allows people to know when
> > works
> > enter the public domain and the license becomes more liberal.
> > I think our users are better served b
On 2023-01-02 at 13:55 -0800, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> I'm entirely happy to reassign this request to systemd and have the
> setting applied more broadly. The question that arises then is what
> to
> do about the file-level capabilities on the ping binary. Ideally we
> drop them entirely (includin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Miguel Ángel García"
* Package name: python-doublex
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : David Villa Alises
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/DavidVilla/python-doublex
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
D
Stefan Esser wrote:
> And there are many many good reasons, why Suhosin must be external to PHP.
> The most obvious one is that the code is clearly separated, so that not
> someone of the hundred PHP commiters accidently breaks a safe guard.
That's not a justification to keep it as a patch.
Safe g
12 matches
Mail list logo
