Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1115714: impossible to install crate zerovec: depends on missing librust-twox-hash-2+xxhash64-dev

2025-09-22 Thread Kevin Chadwick
profile (basically dev/test + optimizations) might be a sensible compromise? that should catch most optimization-related issues, while still keeping (test) compilation times down.. Sigh ("Modern"), Compilation time wouldn't be an issue with Ada SPARK (faster than C++) and it's an easier to

Bug#1116011: ITP: ruby-stimulus-rails -- A modest JavaScript framework for the HTML you already have.

2025-09-22 Thread Soren Stoutner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Soren Stoutner X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-r...@lists.debian.org * Package name: ruby-stimulus-rails Version : 1.3.4 * URL : https://rubygems.org/gems/stimulus-rails * License : Expat Programming L

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-22 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 9/22/25 2:36 PM, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: Am 22.09.2025 um 17:42 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: It can be (arguably) even smaller: If you have debian/upstream/metadata you can add "Archive: Github" to that and remove the watch file. Will the QA page [1] still work or do we have to keep the d/watch

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel (2025-09-22 18:46:57) > It can be (arguably) even smaller: If you have debian/upstream/metadata > you can add "Archive: Github" to that and remove the watch file. > > Where is it documented ? I found it reading the source code for devscripts. I found "metadata" in

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-22 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 04:46:57PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: It can be (arguably) even smaller: If you have debian/upstream/metadata you can add "Archive: Github" to that and remove the watch file. Where is it documented ? I don't think it is. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Descri

Bug#694308: marked as done (A lot of type 1 fonts include Adobe all right reserved code)

2025-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2025 17:52:48 +0200 with message-id and subject line A lot of type 1 fonts include Adobe all right reserved code has caused the Debian Bug report #694308, regarding A lot of type 1 fonts include Adobe all right reserved code to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2025-09-22 13:57:35) > Hi Yadd, > > On Sat, 2025-09-20 at 21:18 +0200, Yadd wrote: > > could you try this debian/watch file ? > > > > Version: 5 > > > > Template: Github > > Owner: FrodeSolheim > > Project: fs-uae > > Wait, what? It can be that minimal? > > I

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-22 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 01:57:35PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: could you try this debian/watch file ? Version: 5 Template: Github Owner: FrodeSolheim Project: fs-uae Wait, what? It can be that minimal? It can be even nonexistent if your debian/upstream/metadata has "Archive: Gi

Bug#1115957: ITP: gnustep-xcode -- library/tools for parsing/building Xcode projects

2025-09-22 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian GNUstep maintainers * Package name: gnustep-xcode Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Gregory John Casamento * URL or Web page : https://github.com/gnustep/libs-xcode * License : LGPL-2.1+ (library), GPL-3+ (tools) Programmi

Re: uscan downloads wrong source tarball from Github

2025-09-22 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Yadd, On Sat, 2025-09-20 at 21:18 +0200, Yadd wrote: > could you try this debian/watch file ? > > Version: 5 > > Template: Github > Owner: FrodeSolheim > Project: fs-uae Wait, what? It can be that minimal? I have to try that :D. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian

Re: Try Debusine for your next upload to unstable!

2025-09-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 14 Sep 2025, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: > I had a look at [1]. As my client is > 0.10.0 I used the automatic > installation, which seemed to work fine, at least I can create work > requests. The test mentioned on the page below however fails. Is it expected > work? > [1] > https://freexian-team

Bug#1115937: ITP: aetos -- reverse-proxy for enforcing openstack multi-tenancy for Prometheus

2025-09-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: aetos Version : 1.0.0~rc1 Upstream Contact: OpenStack Developers * URL : https://opendev.org/openstack/aetos * License : Apache-2.0 Programming