Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-22 00:07:59)
> On 21/09/25 23:05, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Please do not do that. When you know(!) that dependencies are not
> > satisfied but are at the risk of month-long NEW queue processing,
> > upload to experimental instead of to unstable.
>
> I started doing t
On 21/09/25 23:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I have been contacted discretely and kindly requested to a) explicitly
mention crate name in email topic and b) cc additional contact points,
by the reasoning that the Rust team is too overwhelmed to handle their
packaging mailinglist.
I'm happy somebo
On 21/09/25 23:05, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please do not do that. When you know(!) that dependencies are not
satisfied but are at the risk of month-long NEW queue processing,
upload to experimental instead of to unstable.
I started doing that an hour ago with matrix-pickle{-derive,}. I don't
Quoting Philipp Kern (2025-09-21 23:20:46)
> On 9/21/25 11:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-21 22:26:04)
> >> On 21/09/25 10:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> > Please do not knowingly destabilize Debian unstable, but release known
> >> > broken packages to experimen
Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-21 22:26:04)
> On 21/09/25 10:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Please do not knowingly destabilize Debian unstable, but release known
> > broken packages to experimental, re-releasing to unstable only when
> > dependencies are all there.
> [...] there's no such thing a
Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-21 22:43:53)
> On 21/09/25 21:26, Matthias Geiger wrote:
> >> debian-devel@l.d.o is Cc'ed, and debian-rust@l.d.o as well since
> >> apparently the Rust team treats their Maintainer field email address as
> >> something else than for human conversations.
> >>
> > This is n
On 9/21/25 11:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-21 22:26:04)
On 21/09/25 10:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Please do not knowingly destabilize Debian unstable, but release known
> broken packages to experimental, re-releasing to unstable only when
> dependencies are
On 21/09/25 21:26, Matthias Geiger wrote:
debian-devel@l.d.o is Cc'ed, and debian-rust@l.d.o as well since
apparently the Rust team treats their Maintainer field email address as
something else than for human conversations.
This is not fair, and you know it. Many teams use an alioth mail as
Mai
Hi Jonas,
dropping bug report as my answer has nothing to do with it
On 21/09/25 10:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Package: librust-tower-lsp-dev
> Version: 0.20.0-1
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-Cc:debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-r...@lists.debian.org
>
> Package librust-tower-lsp-dev is im
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 10:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Package: librust-tower-lsp-dev
Version: 0.20.0-1
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-r...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package librust-tower-lsp-dev is impossible to install:
On 9/21/25 12:40 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
On 9/20/25 12:18 PM, Yadd wrote:
could you try this debian/watch file ?
We need a backport of devscripts 2.25.19 first.
for trying? you can use the unstable version.
Yes, logging into
Hello,
As others already clarified the question of whether it is supported,
allow me to suggest options.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 12:14:47PM +, Haddad, Serge wrote:
> Our systems in the field run on an armv5 chip (armel architecture) which we
> can't replace with newer boards with a different
>
> And to spell it out explicitly we would prefer if you changed from
> A)
> Upload $package + its missing dependencies to unstable
>
> (Causing unstable containing broken packages for $random, posibly very
> very long time))
>
> to
>
> B)
> * Upload $package + its missing dependen
On 21/09/25 15:35, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I am not part of the Rust team. I am part of Debian.
I am raining an issue generally in Debian, about a seemingly team-wide
behaviour that I find inappropriate for Debian.
I did not initially talk about build flags, but if others want to mix
that into
On 21/09/25 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-20 21:16:08)
On 20/09/25 18:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What is sensible to me is to enable optimization by default and support
DEB_BUILD_OTIONS=noopt. Then it is clearly visible to Debian developers
when a package apply some
(sorry for the late reply)
On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> If the 32-bit ports are going to survive, then the affected packages either
> need to be cross-compiled from a 64-bit architecture (which is not something
> that Debian has traditionally done and not somet
Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-21 15:05:09)
> On 21/09/25 00:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-20 21:16:08)
> >> On 20/09/25 18:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>> What is sensible to me is to enable optimization by default and support
> >>> DEB_BUILD_OTIONS=noopt. Then it is cle
On 9/21/25 6:07 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Am 21. September 2025 14:05:16 MESZ schrieb Bas Couwenberg :
Yes, logging into a sid chroot on trixie systems is too much effort to quickly
test the watch file version.
If you want people to use version 5, make it available in trixie via backports
Am 21. September 2025 14:05:16 MESZ schrieb Bas Couwenberg :
>
>Yes, logging into a sid chroot on trixie systems is too much effort to quickly
>test the watch file version.
>
>If you want people to use version 5, make it available in trixie via backports.
>
as a regular workflow: sure.
however,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 6:23 AM Alexander Kjäll
wrote:
> >
> > And to spell it out explicitly we would prefer if you changed from
> > A)
> > Upload $package + its missing dependencies to unstable
> >
> > (Causing unstable containing broken packages for $random, posibly very
> > very long
Quoting Alexander Kjäll (2025-09-21 12:23:01)
> >
> > And to spell it out explicitly we would prefer if you changed from
> > A)
> > Upload $package + its missing dependencies to unstable
> >
> > (Causing unstable containing broken packages for $random, posibly very
> > very long time))
> >
Package: librust-tower-lsp-dev
Version: 0.20.0-1
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-r...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package librust-tower-lsp-dev is impossible to install: depends on
missing package librust-async-codec-lite-0.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 02:04:09PM -0700, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/20/25 12:18 PM, Yadd wrote:
> > could you try this debian/watch file ?
> We need a backport of devscripts 2.25.19 first.
for trying? you can use the unstable version.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(de
23 matches
Mail list logo
