> > I think this significantly underestimates the annoyance involved in renaming
> > existing long-lived branches (in that all clients have to re-clone or
> > manually adjust), which is certainly why I generally avoid doing so unless I
> > absolutely have to.
...
> This could even be something that
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 10:50:21PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 02:35:14PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
> > Once we have a decision, Guido is more likely
> > to support making that decision the default in git-buildpackage, and
> > the people who previously migrated from
On 2025-05-09 17:26:25 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 07:15:03PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > jas@kaka:~$ ls /usr/games/|wc -l
> > > 21
> > Indeed. I thought that there were a lot more in /usr/games.
>
> $ apt-file search /usr/games|wc -l
> 1184
OK. I'm wondering why
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 02:35:14PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
I have published similar stats before and I ran a large "poll" on this
mailing list with subject "DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest'
objections?" to find out what the objections are. My take is that a
vocal minority with ve
Hi Lucas,
Thank you for collecting the statistics.
Lucas Nussbaum ezt írta (időpont: 2025. máj. 11., V, 22:36):
>
> On 09/05/25 at 12:43 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I would love to see data about the actual acceptance of DEP-14 among
> > packages in the archive: my feeling is that it is cur
Hi
> So, it looks like among the largest packaging teams, only the go team,
> the gnome team, and the php team have significantly adopted DEP-14.
>
> Note that this is not a criticism of DEP-14, only an attempt at
> providing numbers about DEP-14 adoption.
I have published similar stats before an
On 09/05/25 at 12:43 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I would love to see data about the actual acceptance of DEP-14 among
> packages in the archive: my feeling is that it is currently being a bit
> ignored by maintainers and teams (but maybe I'm wrong).
I started working on a salsa importer in UDD.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Spaarsh Thakkar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, spaarshthakkar11...@gmail.com
* Package name: hipblas-common
Version : 6.4.0
* URL : https://github.com/ROCm/hipBLAS-common
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C+
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathan Carter
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: zfs-autobackup
Version : 3.3
Upstream Contact: psy0rz (https://github.com/psy0rz)
* URL : https://github.com/psy0rz/zfs_autobackup
* License : G
Hello,
On Wed, 07 May 2025, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> So whatever you call your intention here I guess we should see it with
> welcoming eyes. But, if one feels ITN can be somewhat misleading, let's
> just try something else: ITR (Intent to Revamp)?
>
> "to change or arrange something agai
10 matches
Mail list logo
