Hi,
On 9/25/24 08:55, Guillem Jover wrote:
So if there was a switch, those would end up
being recorded as well, and used when reproducing the outputs. And this
could also happen with a newer version of zlib itself.
I have a POWER9 box, which includes a NX-GZIP coprocessor, which is
currently
Le Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:58:10PM +0200, Mark Brown a écrit :
>
>zlib-ng: https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng
Hi Mark, just out of curiosity, would the carbon footprint of Debian be
lower or higher after replacing zlib with zlib-ng?
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 01:55:17AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 00:39:10 +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote:
> > * Guillem Jover [2024-09-24 17:45]:
> > > Personally, I think fully migrating from zlib to zlib-ng would sound
> > > great (even for trixie), but I guess we can
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 00:39:10 +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote:
> * Guillem Jover [2024-09-24 17:45]:
> > Personally, I think fully migrating from zlib to zlib-ng would sound
> > great (even for trixie), but I guess we can take it slow if you do not
> > feel confident or have concerns over this.
>
* Guillem Jover [2024-09-24 17:45]:
[...]
> Personally, I think fully migrating from zlib to zlib-ng would sound
> great (even for trixie), but I guess we can take it slow if you do not
> feel confident or have concerns over this.
As using an alternative zlib implementation could impact Reproduci
Hi!
We've overhauled the README.md at
https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline to be as complete as
possible, yet clear and to the point. If you are not yet using Salsa
CI for pre-upload quality assurance for your package, you might want
to check out what Salsa CI offers, or just review tha
Hi!
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 15:58:10 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> In the past I've pushed back on doing anything here since zlib is
> essential and it seemed better to be consistent over the ecosystem than
> to use a more niche implementation, and some of the early optimisation
> efforts had not worke
A recurrning question with the zlib package in Debian is interest in the
various alternative zlib implementations that are out there. There was
a long period where upstream zlib development seemed very stalled,
during that period people who wanted improvements started forking their
own projects.
On 23.09.24 13:33, Richard Lewis wrote:
Lukas Märdian writes:
On 23.09.24 12:27, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
On Mon, 2024-09-23 at 12:22 +0200, Lukas Märdian wrote:
On 22.09.24 15:58, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 13:12 +0200, Lukas Märdian wrote:
The benefit that Netplan would provide in suc
Il 24/09/2024 14:43, Stephan Verbücheln ha scritto:
Hello everyone
Debian Trixie and Sid still have GnuPG 2.2.x. GnuPG 2.4.5 is available
in Experimental.
GnuPG 2.4.0 was released on December 20, 2022. The 2.4.x series has
various useful new features such as TPM support.
Is it realistic to get
Hello everyone
Debian Trixie and Sid still have GnuPG 2.2.x. GnuPG 2.4.5 is available
in Experimental.
GnuPG 2.4.0 was released on December 20, 2022. The 2.4.x series has
various useful new features such as TPM support.
Is it realistic to get GnuPG 2.4 into Trixie before the freeze?
What is mis
Hi,
On 9/22/24 19:22, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
The "server" group supposedly wants (and I agree) networkd, but they also want
the configuration interface of networkd.
I'm not sure about that -- I'd expect the "server" group to be split into
- "pets": their IP address doesn't change often
On mån, 2024/09/23 at 10:57:22 +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi Sirius,
>
> Thanks for taking ifupdown-ng for a spin.
No problem at all. Thank you for being patient for my response, I have
been working out some kinks around finit to get the system spitting out a
graphical session. :-D
> On Mon,
Chris Hofstaedtler wrote on 23/09/2024 at 12:25:15+0200:
> * Pierre-Elliott Bécue [240923 11:34]:
>> Lukas Märdian wrote on 20/09/2024 at 13:12:36+0200:
>> > # Why
>> > The ifupdown package is a Debian only solution that is becoming a
>> > maintenance
>> > burden. We've had plenty of discussio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ocaml-stdlib-random
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Contact: Florian Angeletti
* URL : https://github.com/ocaml/stdlib-rand
15 matches
Mail list logo
