Hi,
Quoting Luca Boccassi (2024-05-28 01:54:08)
> Thanks for the useful input, the following has been done:
>
> - existing installations pre-trixie will get an orphaned tmpfiles.d in
> /etc/ that keeps the existing behaviour unchanged (no cleanup of
> /var/tmp)
> - openssh and tmux have been fixe
On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:35:27 +0300, Hakan Bay?nd?r
wrote:
>I'll kindly disagree here. I'd rather not have to go back to every
>system and make sure that they all behave the way I want after doing a
>periodic, completely boring "apt-get upgrade".
This change is likely to come to the majority of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sudip Mukherjee
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com
* Package name: veristat
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Contact: many
* URL : https://github.com/libbpf/veristat
* License : GPL-2.0-only O
> On 29 May 2024, at 17:33, Marvin Renich wrote:
>
> * Hakan Bayındır [240529 07:51]:
>> On 28.05.2024 ÖS 8:16, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> On 2024-05-28 Luca Boccassi
>>> wrote:
>>> [...]
- existing installations pre-trixie will get an orphaned tmpfiles.d in
/etc/ that keeps the e
On Wed, 2024-05-29 at 18:58 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> That is false dichotomy. data-loss will occur when people use /tmp or
> /var/tmp for persistent data-storage because "This has (for a couple
> of
> years) worked on Debian systems" not because "This has (for a couple
> of
> yea
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 06:58:32PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> I think it is bad choice to deliberately have different behavior for
> >> freshly installed and upgraded systems. Offering upgrades has always
> >> been one of the major selling points of Debian, and imho this
> >> implicitely in
On 2024-05-29 Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 28, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> I think it is bad choice to deliberately have different behavior for
>> freshly installed and upgraded systems. Offering upgrades has always
>> been one of the major selling points of Debian, and imho this
>> implicitely in
* Hakan Bayındır [240529 07:51]:
> On 28.05.2024 ÖS 8:16, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2024-05-28 Luca Boccassi
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> > > - existing installations pre-trixie will get an orphaned tmpfiles.d in
> > > /etc/ that keeps the existing behaviour unchanged (no cleanup of
> > > /var/tmp
Hello,
On 2024-05-26 20:35, Santiago Vila wrote:
After we make a stable release, there is usually a constant flow
of packages which start to FTBFS due to "time bombs", i.e. expired
SSL certificates used in tests and other similar reasons.
Just FYI, there is a suggestion to implement lintian hi
On 28.05.2024 ÖS 8:16, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2024-05-28 Luca Boccassi
wrote:
[...]
- existing installations pre-trixie will get an orphaned tmpfiles.d in
/etc/ that keeps the existing behaviour unchanged (no cleanup of
/var/tmp)
[...]
Hello,
I think it is bad choice to deliberately ha
On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 11:48, Lorenzo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> socklog-run is a syslog daemon, it has no dependency on
> system-log-daemon
Yes the initial list had some false positives, it has been pruned when
filing and socklog-run is not part of it:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users
On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 08:18, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 00:44:29 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >On May 28, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> I think it is bad choice to deliberately have different behavior for
> >> freshly installed and upgraded systems. Offering upgrades has always
> >
On Wed, 29 May 2024 00:44:29 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>On May 28, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> I think it is bad choice to deliberately have different behavior for
>> freshly installed and upgraded systems. Offering upgrades has always
>> been one of the major selling points of Debian, and imho th
13 matches
Mail list logo
