Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marcos Rodrigues de Carvalho (aka oday)"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, marcosrcarvalh...@gmail.com
* Package name: python-autodocsumm
Version : 0.2.12
Upstream Contact: Philipp S. Sommer
* URL : https://github.co
So when introducing a new soname (no just a new package name), then one
should move to time64 even on i386 ?
The problem with doing this is that
1. A reverse dependency may depend on more than one library that uses time_t
in it's API. Said reverse dependency would not be able to be sanely b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Harlan Lieberman-Berg
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, an...@beanfield.com,
hlieber...@debian.org
* Package name: python-command-runner
Version : 1.6.0
Upstream Contact: Orsiris de Jong
* URL : https://github.com/netinve
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nilesh Patra
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nil...@debian.org
* Package name: corrosion
Version : 0.4.7
Upstream Contact: Andrew Gaspar
* URL : https://github.com/corrosion-rs/corrosion
* License : MIT
Pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marcos Rodrigues de Carvalho (aka oday)"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org ,
marcosrcarvalh...@gmail.com
* Package name: anew
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Contact: Tom Hudson
* URL : https://g
Hi,
Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 06:46:58PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> Looking at "your" bug #1062097 it looks like you were unlucky, mine all
> had a fat warning "NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to
> unstable yet!".
I also was trapping into that pitfall when I was intending to fix
an
On 2024-02-09 John Goerzen wrote:
[...]
> So at the moment, I am unclear why there are bugs filed with severity
> serious that apparently cannot be fixed. Shouldn't they be normal with
> a tag wontfix until the relevant dpkg changes are in unstable?
> To put it another way, I'm not seeing why we
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 15:24 +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > when introducing a new soname (no just a new package name), then one
> > should move to time64 even on i386 ?
>
> If you know all consumers of the package will be using a
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 15:24 +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> when introducing a new soname (no just a new package name), then one
> should move to time64 even on i386 ?
If you know all consumers of the package will be using appropriate
compiler flags to get 64-bit time_t, then this is fine.
Ot
Hi everyone,
Thanks to all that have put so much time and thought into the time_t
migration. I am late to this party and am trying to figure my way
through it.
Quite a few of my packages are marked for removal from testing because
time_t migration bugs have been filed with severity serious. Som
On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 at 15:24:50 +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> But fundamentally, how do we know how third-party binaries
> are compiled ?
We don't, but we can make some inferences.
If they are i386 binaries that already worked on Debian 12 or older,
and they call into time_t-sensitive ABIs (for
Le Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 10:20:40AM +, Simon McVittie a écrit :
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 at 05:03:23 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > if the maintainer
> > has requested it explicitly via DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=abi=+time64, then
> > it should enable it also on i386 (changed behavior).
> >
> > The reason
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ford
Version : 7.0.5
Upstream Contact: Christopher MacMackin
* URL : https://github.com/Fortran-FOSS-Programmers/for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pymbolic
Version : 2022.2
Upstream Contact: Andreas Klöckner
* URL : https://github.com/inducer/pymbolic
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: codetiming
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Contact: David Beazley
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/codetiming
* License : MIT
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Ballarin
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org,
francesco.balla...@unicatt.it
* Package name: adios4dolfinx
Version : 0.7.3
Upstream Contact: Jørgen S. Dokken
* URL : http://jsdo
On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 at 05:03:23 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> if the maintainer
> has requested it explicitly via DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=abi=+time64, then
> it should enable it also on i386 (changed behavior).
>
> The reason is that this does not now break ABI for any package (in Debian
> or out of Deb
Hans-Christoph Steiner writes:
>> In business, such things are confirmed (often badly) by independent
>> audit. For a volunteer-driven community effort, we have to rely on
>> everyone to exercise their best judgement in these sorts of matters.
>
> Debian could also get independent, professional a
18 matches
Mail list logo
