Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gürkan Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gnome-prompt
Version : 46~alpha
Upstream Authors: Christian Hergert
URL : https://gitlab.gnome.org/chergert/prompt
* License : GPL-3.0-or-later
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: loki-ecmwf
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Contact: Michael Lange (michael.la...@ecmwf.int)
* URL : https://github.com/ecmwf-ifs/loki
* License : Apa
Hi,
On 1/23/24 05:25, matt wrote:
* Package name: chatterino
I might be interested in that.
- I plan on maintaining it by compiling the latest package or use the
deb they provide, inside a packaging team
🤔
I would need a need a sponsor
I currently have a 60 hour workweek,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: matt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: chatterino
Version : 2.4.6
Upstream Author : https://github.com/chatterino/chatterino2
* URL : https://chatterino.com/
* URL :
* License : (MI
On 2024-01-22, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Unfortunately, perhaps because common build systems like Autotools,
> Meson and CMake make it awkward to use non-numeric SONAME suffixes,
With CMake it is actually quite simple. Even to a point where it is easy
to get wrong:
add_library(Foo SHARED foo.cpp)
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 05:31:45 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Others in this list have package names I don't understand, such as a 'd'
> suffix that doesn't correspond to anything in the soname
I believe this is conventionally used to mean "this is a Debian-specific
SONAME that intentionally diff
In exercising scripts for the mass NMUs in a dry run, I've run into another
little snag.
$ grep -vEc '[0-9](c102|c2|g|ldbl|v5)?$' reports/runtime-libs
234
$
The package rename handling assumes that the affected runtime library
packages have names matching a certain pattern (ends in a digit, plus
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:52:02AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I can offer to maintain hosting and packaging of debtags code projects.
> Would that be helpful, or are/were you looking for new code maintainer?
Thank you for your interest! Personally I am not motivated to look after
Debtags an
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 17:14:11 -0700, Stan Johnson wrote:
> The bottom line is that there appears to be a dependency issue in Debian
> SID at the moment
You can't *necessarily* draw this conclusion from a failure to
upgrade. You are using powerpc, which is a "ports" architecture that is
not reall
9 matches
Mail list logo
