Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timelineg

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:33:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > And my proposal for checking that set, since we're only talking about > runtime library packages, is to check whether any of the contents of these > packages in bookworm match ^/lib - as a runtime library package NOT matching > this

Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

Hi, On 2024-01-18 00:38, Simon McVittie wrote: On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 23:15:03 +0100, Matthias Geiger wrote: Am 17.01.24 um 23:00 schrieb Simon McVittie: > Public GIR XML (Foo-1.gir) is normally in the -dev package alongside the > C headers, but recent versions of gobject-introspection define a