On 15 November 2023 5:10:50 am IST, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>On the surface, this means Proton Mail (free account) is great! And for
>general use, I feel like we should be supportive of them; however, I'm
>starting to wonder if we need to recommend against the use of Proton
>mail for Debian
On Tue, 2023-11-14 at 18:40 -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> I see three outcomes:
>
> A) Continue to explain this to new contributors on a one-by-one
> basis.
> B) Advise against using Proton Mail for Debian work (where? our
> wiki?)
> C) Proton Mail begins to do something differently on th
Hi,
On 11/15/23 08:40, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
1. I've received a report that this provider is not appropriate for DM
and DD use, because the key pair is stored on their servers. Ie: The
applicant doesn't control the means to validating identity and
authorship.
Correct. I'd even go as far
Hello,
Please retain me in CC for all replies.
Everyone reading this most likely believes that PGP/GPG is a good thing;
Many will advocate for its use-by-default for even unimportant
correspondences, because privacy is a right. Meanwhile, everyday usage
of encryption normalises it, which is impo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthias Geiger
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org,
werdah...@riseup.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: kooha
Version : 2.2.4
Upstream Contact: Dave Patrick Caber
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Westover
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: controku
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Contact: Ben Westover
* URL : https://github.com/benthetechguy/controku
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tobias Heider
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: asahi-audio
Version : 0.5
Upstream Authors: The Asahi Linux Contributors
URL : https://github.com/AsahiLinux/asahi-audio
* License : MIT
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ananthu C V
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: yte
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : Johannes K��ster
* URL : https://github.com/yte-template-engine/yte
* License
On 14/11/23 11:11, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I welcome the effort in general. Like Andreas, I question whether having
pidof remain essential is useful. A quick codesearch
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=%5Cbpidof%5Cb&literal=0 suggests
that we have less than 500 source packages that even mentio
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 10:13, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> So in essence, you asked for changing the pidof implementation and
> Andreas and me try to turn this into a much bigger quest of making it
> non-essential. While these matters are related, they can be done
> independently in principle and if you
Hi Craig,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 05:29:01PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about
> changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A
> quick scan of the various distributions shows that only Debian an
Hi,
On 11/14/23 18:42, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Instead I think pidof can just be part of procps package. The
sysvinit-utils package will then pull in procps via a dependency (once
sysvinit-utils stops being Essential), which would smooth the transition
for all sysvinit users until LSB pidofpr
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 05:29:01PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> For quite some time (since 2006!) there has been a discussion at[1] about
> changing from the sysvinit-utils version of pidof to the procps one. A
> quick scan of the various distributions shows that only Debian and U
13 matches
Mail list logo
