Hi ftpmasters and
developers who contributed to previous discussion with ftpmaster on this list
You might have noticed that I registered "Chatting with ftpmasters"[1]
for Debconf which is scheduled Sep 11 (Mon): 16:30 local time in Kochi
(just check the website for your local time which is printe
Hi,
On Fri, 08 Sep 2023 07:34:43 -0700
Russ Allbery wrote:
> The really interesting part of SPDX is the license list and the canonical
> name assignment, which is *way* more active and *way* more mature at this
> point than the equivalent in Debian. They have a much larger license
> list, which
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mo Zhou
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-expecttest
* URL : https://github.com/ezyang/expecttest/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: (python
Description : expect test for python
Unit testing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jongmin Kim
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-samber-lo
Version : 1.38.0
Upstream Contact: Samuel Berthe
* URL : https://github.com/samber/lo
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jongmin Kim
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-jesseduffield-lazycore
Version : 0.0~git20221023.718a4ca
Upstream Contact: Jesse Duffield
* URL : https://github.c
On 2023-09-08 13:31:43 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2023-09-08 12:09:09 +0530 (+0530), Hideki Yamane wrote:
> [...]
> > SPDX is led by the Linux foundation project, OpenChain for license
> > compliance.
> [...]
>
> Unless I'm misreading, OpenChain follows the REUSE specification
> w
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 07:34:43AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I don't think the file format is the most interesting part of SPDX. They
> don't really have a competing format equivalent to the functionality of
> our copyright files (at least that I've seen; I vaguely follow their
> lists). Last
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Only issue I am aware of is that SPDX shortname "MIT" equals Debian
> shortname "Expat".
There was also some sort of weirdly ideological argument with the FSF
about what identifiers to use for the GPL and related licenses, which
resulted in SPDX using an "-only" and "-
Jeremy Stanley writes:
> Since Debian's machine-readable format has been around longer than
> either of the newer formats you mentioned, it seems like it would make
> more sense for the tools to incorporate a parser for it rather than
> create needless churn in the package archive just to transfo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: slowloris
Version : 0.14.2
Upstream Contact: Gokberk Yaltirakli
* URL : https://github.com/gkbrk/slowloris
* Lice
On 2023-09-08 12:09:09 +0530 (+0530), Hideki Yamane wrote:
[...]
> SPDX is led by the Linux foundation project, OpenChain for license
> compliance.
[...]
Unless I'm misreading, OpenChain follows the REUSE specification
which acknowledges the sufficiency of "DEP5" formatted license info:
https:/
Hi Hideki,
Quoting Hideki Yamane (2023-09-08 08:39:09)
½>
> tl;dr: How about considering updating debian/copyright format to have
> more compatibility with SPDX format
>
>
> SBOM is expected to be used widely and several tools support it as a trend
> now, since US government asks to
tl;dr: How about considering updating debian/copyright format to have
more compatibility with SPDX format
SBOM is expected to be used widely and several tools support it as a trend
now, since US government asks to use it. There are two formats for it,
Software Package Data Exchange
13 matches
Mail list logo
