On Sun, 2023-08-13 at 22:59 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> There's talk on #d-python if pybuild could/should deal with it; I'd
> give it a few days and see if that pans out.
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/dh-python/-/merge_requests/46
seems to be the one to watch.
Ian.
Am 16.08.23 um 06:02 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 22:09 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
I received a couple of bug reports against packages I (co) maintain
regarding this issue and having a quick look, quite a few fail due to
python scripts being run during the build and creating a __py
On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 22:09 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I received a couple of bug reports against packages I (co) maintain
> regarding this issue and having a quick look, quite a few fail due to
> python scripts being run during the build and creating a __pycache__
> directory.
I recommend a
On Sun, 2023-08-13 at 22:28 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> > dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
> > plakativ-0.5.1/plakativ.egg-info/SOURCES.txt
>
> since this issue seems to be affecting a few more packages than plakativ, I
> wanted to ask here
On Sun, 2023-08-13 at 21:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Similarly, I got one for __pycache__/*.cpython-311.pyc file
> overwrites... is that something dh_python should clean?
Probably just send upstream a change removing them?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Des
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 09:21 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> --- ibus-array-0.2.2.orig/po/zh_TW.po
> +++ ibus-array-0.2.2/po/zh_TW.po
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ msgid ""
> msgstr ""
> "Project-Id-Version: ibus-array 0.2.2\n"
> "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: https://github.com/lexical/ibus-array/issues\n";
> -"POT-Cr
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 09:21:22 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> I am looking for advice in handling these MBF reports against packages that do
> irreversible changes to the source files during build every time (such as
> updating timestamp). A broad category would be packages using Gettext + PO
> combi
> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
Lucas> But unless we go further than that and decide that we don't
Lucas> care at all about 'source builds after successful builds',
Lucas> the bugs (which where filed severity:minor) remain valid.
FWIW in terms of building toward a consensus.
On Aug 15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> The proper approach is IMO one of these:
Or else, if you know that they do not actually need to be rebuilt: just
disable in the makefile the target which causes them to be rebuilt.
This is what I do in my packages.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2023-08-15 17:26:13)
> Quoting Boyuan Yang (2023-08-15 16:28:19)
> > Hi,
> >
> > 在 2023-08-15星期二的 16:16 +0200，Jonas Smedegaard写道：
> > > Quoting Boyuan Yang (2023-08-15 15:21:22)
> > > > I am looking for advice in handling these MBF reports against packages
> > > > that do
Quoting Boyuan Yang (2023-08-15 16:28:19)
> Hi,
>
> 在 2023-08-15星期二的 16:16 +0200，Jonas Smedegaard写道：
> > Quoting Boyuan Yang (2023-08-15 15:21:22)
> > > I am looking for advice in handling these MBF reports against packages
> > > that do
> > > irreversible changes to the source files during build
On 2023-08-15 Boyuan Yang wrote:
[...]
> where .po file that contains translation is updated every time, causing dpkg-
> source to complain the diff and quit when building twoce in a row.
> Take https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ibus-array as an example. The upstream
> project does not include .pot
Hi Hugh,
I work on groff upstream.
At 2023-08-15T22:46:30+1000, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor
> failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE
> macro called with TW register undefined)
>
> It seems TW is not defined in the num
Hi,
在 2023-08-15星期二的 16:16 +0200，Jonas Smedegaard写道：
> Quoting Boyuan Yang (2023-08-15 15:21:22)
> > I am looking for advice in handling these MBF reports against packages
> > that do
> > irreversible changes to the source files during build every time (such as
> > updating timestamp). A broad cat
Quoting Boyuan Yang (2023-08-15 15:21:22)
> I am looking for advice in handling these MBF reports against packages that do
> irreversible changes to the source files during build every time (such as
> updating timestamp). A broad category would be packages using Gettext + PO
> combination with /usr
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 10:46:30PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Lintian has recently started emitting this groff warning for ftlint.1
> in freetype-demos as part of its man pages check:
>
> groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor
> failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely
Hi all,
(Sorry for losing all contexts -- I deleted all previous mails in the thread
sent to my mailbox, and could not find a way to re-download mailing list email
from https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/ . It is possible in bug reports on
https://bugs.debian.org though. Now replying with empty
Lintian has recently started emitting this groff warning for ftlint.1
in freetype-demos as part of its man pages check:
groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor
failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE
macro called with TW register undefined)
It seems TW i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pcre2-ocaml
Version : 0.0.0~git20230408
* URL : https://github.com/tobil4sk/pcre2-ocaml
* License : LGPL-2.1+
How would one implement this in the common Salsa CI pipeline?
There is an old issue for this [0], but unless someone provides an MR
its unlikely to get implemented.
Occasional rebuild campaigns like this don't catch regression in a
timely manner. Having a build-twice job in the Salsa CI pipel
Hi,
I fear we are not done with empty directory loss yet. This is a
technical update for future reference.
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:59:58AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:53:00AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > In effect, this bug report is an instance of a bug class.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: rust-ed25519
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Contact: RustCrypto Developers
* URL : https://github.com/rustcry
On 15/08/23 at 01:29 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > Yes. You are right. I (and most of the others who expressed an
> > interest in having this working) mostly care about doing a binary
> > build repeatedly. But doesn't this amount to much t
On 14/08/23 at 22:09 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Could maybe dh_clean automatically clean up such __pycache__ directories or
> do we really expect that each individual package does such a clean up
> manually?
> Or is there maybe a way to avoid the creation of the __pycache__ directories
> altoget
24 matches
Mail list logo
