Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-07 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2023-08-07, Benjamin Drung wrote: > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations > for armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern: The library -dev > packages was missing one or more dependencies on another -dev package. > Over 200 -dev packages are affected. I don'

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-07 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Benjamin Drung (2023-08-07 20:43:36) > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations for > armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern: The library -dev packages was > missing one or more dependencies on another -dev package. Over 200 -dev > packages are affe

Issues in the Patch Tagging Guidelines

2023-08-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! Lately I've been updating metadata in patches in packages I maintain and noticed several issues with the Patch Tagging Guidelines, and after Lucas created the new great patches UDD service [P] and we discussed some other issues there, it looked like the guidelines could do with some fixes and

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-07 Thread Benjamin Drung
On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 22:52 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:43:36PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations > > for armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern: The library -dev > > packages was

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:43:36PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Hi, > > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations > for armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern: The library -dev > packages was missing one or more dependencies on another -dev package. > Over 200

autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-07 Thread Benjamin Drung
Hi, while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations for armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern: The library -dev packages was missing one or more dependencies on another -dev package. Over 200 -dev packages are affected. I propose to add an autodep8 test for C/C++ hea

Bug#1043231: ITP: node-quickjs-emscripten -- Javascript/Typescript bindings for QuickJS compiled to WebAssembly

2023-08-07 Thread Israel Galadima
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Israel Galadima X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name    : node-quickjs-emscripten   Version : 0.15.0   Upstream Author : Jake Teton-Landis * URL : https://github.com/justjake/quickjs-emscripten#readme * License

Bug#1043208: ITP: rust-gix - Pure Rust implementation of Git

2023-08-07 Thread Blair Noctis
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Blair Noctis X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, n...@sail.ng * Package name: rust-gix Version : 0.51.0 Upstream Contact: Sebastian Thiel * URL : https://crates.io/crates/gitoxide * License : Apache-2.0 OR MIT

Re: The future of mipsel port

2023-08-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:09:40AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 13:54 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > I am late to the party but as i mentioned a couple times on debian-mips > > already i'd like to keep mipsel as a debian-port - and i'd like to > > revert away from mips32r2 b

Bug#1043206: ITP: rust-snow -- pure-rust Noise Protocol Framework implementation - Rust source code

2023-08-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: rust-snow Version : 0.9.2 Upstream Contact: Jake McGinty * URL : https://github.com/mcginty/snow * Lic

Re: The future of mipsel port

2023-08-07 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi, On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:53:02AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > From what I have understood from YunQiang plans, it is currently not > planned to import mipsel on debian-ports. Are you volunteering for > maintaining such a port? I am not interested in mips32r2 as i have no hardware for th

Re: The future of mipsel port

2023-08-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On 2023-08-06 13:54, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:45:51PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > > Hi, folks, > > > > Welcome to era of Trixie, and let's talk about the future of mipsel. > > > So I consider to suggest drop mipsel support from the list of official > >