The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1225 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 157 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
[ Following up on the older discussion... ]
t...@debian.org wrote:
>kilobyte wrote:
>
>>At this point, I'd just enable os-prober unconditionally, and think of a
>
>Erm, *no*?!
>
>os-prober corrupts data when called (in virtualisation/emulation
>guests, at the very least).
>
>
>Steve wrote:
>
>>I'm
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:53:31 +0200, Helmut Grohne
wrote:
>failing
>our Code of Conduct
The thread went CoC and died. End of discussion for me.
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Hea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrea Righi
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 ITP
* Package name: kernelcraft
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Andrea Righi
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/arighi/kernelcraft
* License : GP
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:57:58AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Constitution 2.1.1 is great, however we don't really have a mechanism how to
> deal with people flat out ignoring Constitution 6 aka the tech-ctte and
> doubting
> and activly working against it's decisions.
We have: we can fi
On Apr 27, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The origin of this thread was a proposal to adapt dpkg. Your mail
No, Marc is right. The origin of this thread is trying to find
workaround because the dpkg maintainer refused long ago to implement
a simpler solution.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descriptio
Hi Simon,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> You might reasonably say that "the maintainer of bar didn't add the
> correct Breaks/Replaces on foo" is a RC bug in bar - and it is! - but
> judging by the number of "missing Breaks/Replaces" bug reports that have
> to be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yadd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-jss
Version : 10.10.0
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/cssinjs/jss/issues
* URL : https://github.com/cssinjs/jss
* License : Expat
Programming La
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:58:46AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> My gut feeling is that we are wasting prescious time of numerous
> skilled Debian Developers to find ugly workarounds to something that
> should be done in dpkg, but isnt being done because one dpkg
> maintainer has decided to not go the
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:54:58AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:20:34 +0200, Simon Richter
> wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 04:25:19PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> I am not sure whether it is doing non-systemd users a favor to keep a
> >> probably outdated, bitrotting and
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:58:46AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> My gut feeling is that we are wasting prescious time of numerous
> skilled Debian Developers to find ugly workarounds to something that
> should be done in dpkg, but isnt being done because one dpkg
> maintainer has decided to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yadd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-css-vendor
Version : 2.0.8
Upstream Contact: Oleg Slobodskoi
* URL : https://github.com/cssinjs/css-vendor
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaS
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 08:20:34 +0200, Simon Richter
wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 04:25:19PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> I am not sure whether it is doing non-systemd users a favor to keep a
>> probably outdated, bitrotting and untested init script in the
>> canonical place. My gut feeling is that
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:58:35 +0200, Simon Richter
wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:34:06AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>> At some point the question becomes: Do we want that complexity inside
>> dpkg (aka DEP 17 or some variant of it) or outside of dpkg (i.e. what
>> we're talking about here). I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: palace
Version : 0.11.0
Upstream Authors: AWS Center for Quantum Computing (CQC).
URL : https://github.com/awslabs/palace
* License : Apache-2.0
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gürkan Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: glvis
Version : 4.2
Upstream Authors: Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC
URL : https://github.com/GLVis/glvis
* License : BSD-3-clause
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 09:02:38AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 22:44 +0300, Boian Bonev wrote:
>
> > OTOH it is an un-favor to move or remove it
> ...
> > It is better to keep the init script in place.
Absolutely.
> Another option is the orphan-sysvinit-scripts package:
Whic
17 matches
Mail list logo
