On August 25, 2022 10:52:56 AM GMT+02:00, "Sebastian Dröge"
wrote:
>PS: To preempt any questions as for why, the background for my decision
>to stop maintaining any packages is this thread, but it's really just
>the straw that broke the camel's back
>
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1261 (new: 10)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 177 (new: 2)
Total number of packages reque
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
a...@debian.org,debian-j...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: liblanguage-detector-java
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Nakatani Shuyo, Francois ROLAND, Fabian Kessler,
Hello,
On Wed 24 Aug 2022 at 12:09AM GMT, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 04:59:10PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
>> Commonly, I update a package that provides a shared library. Due to the
>> package naming convention, a new SOVERSION necessitates a trip through NEW,
>> which in
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:06:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > The patch for dropping NEW binaries has been in dak for two years but
> > its configuration options were never enabled by ftp-master so far.
> > Dinstall::ThrowAwayNewBinarySuites
> > Dinstall::ThrowAwayNewBinaryComponents
> I would b
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 07:13:52PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > In testing and on release architectures, I'm only aware [1] of one that
> > can't build arch:all+arch:any binaries on amd64 (cmucl), but even that
> > one builds its arch:all bin
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> In testing and on release architectures, I'm only aware [1] of one that
> can't build arch:all+arch:any binaries on amd64 (cmucl), but even that
> one builds its arch:all binaries on amd64. I'm wondering if there are
> packages where this i
Hi all
On 25-08-2022 02:43, Paul Wise wrote:
I don't think Build-Architecture header is done yet?
Neither do I.
Although since we
build all arch:all packages on amd64 machines now I don't think this is
needed for throwing away NEW binaries?
In testing and on release architectures, I'm only
Hi!
Currently I'm the only maintainer for the GStreamer packages, basically
all on this list here:
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=gstreamer...@packages.debian.org
I'm not planning to maintain them (or any of my other packages) further
in the near future but will keep things running s
On 2022-08-25 08:43:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 23:19 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> > I run
> >
> > $ drt-tools process-excuses
> >
> > once a day (except during VAC or when I am not in front of a box with my
> > Debian keys). That schedules binNMUs for all packages
10 matches
Mail list logo
