Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libnet-amqp-rabbitmq-perl
Version : 2.40009
Upstream Author : Mark Ellis Michael Stemle Jr.
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Net-AMQP-Rabbit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benedikt Wildenhain (BO)
* Package name: golang-github-amalfra-etag
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Amal Francis
* URL : https://github.com/amalfra/etag
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A g
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> docker images probably can move earlier as they don't have
> as much interactive users that use tools that might be broken
> (e.g. software-properties).
I didn't see any open disagreement in this thread (apologies if I
missed it elsewhere), and I think this makes sense
Adam Borowski writes:
> Guys, once again we had a complaint about forcing people to waste their
> time on copyright matters then wait months or years for review of said
> matters -- just for the discussion degenerate into a proposal to bring
> even MORE copyright into our life!
To be very clear,
Guys, once again we had a complaint about forcing people to waste their time
on copyright matters then wait months or years for review of said matters
-- just for the discussion degenerate into a proposal to bring even MORE
copyright into our life!
> - What is REUSE?
> The REUSE specification [1]
Russ Allbery writes:
> I can tell you from prior experience with DEP-5 that 3 is wildly
> controversial and will produce the most pushback. There are a lot of
> packagers who flatly refuse to even use the DEP-5 format, and (pace
> Jonas's aspirations) I don't expect that to change any time soon.
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 2:45:18 PM EST Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Release Team member hat on, but not speaking on behalf of the team. I
> haven't consulted anybody on the idea I mention below.
>
> On 08-02-2022 14:59, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> > If people want licensing and copyright is
Hi,
Release Team member hat on, but not speaking on behalf of the team. I
haven't consulted anybody on the idea I mention below.
On 08-02-2022 14:59, Scott Kitterman wrote:
If people want licensing and copyright issues to be treated like other RC
bugs, I think the first step is to treat them
Stephan Lachnit writes:
> It would require a minor change: putting the verbatim license texts in a
> single file is not possible anymore. But I don't why just copying the
> licenses to "/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/licenses/LICENSE" in addition to the
> SPDX formatted debian/copyright would be any wors
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 2:38:29 PM EST Russ Allbery wrote:
> Scott Kitterman writes:
> > Technically it would be the simplest, but there's a process for policy
> > changes that's more involved than writing emails to d-devel. I'm
> > suggesting you engage with it on this topic if you want the
Scott Kitterman writes:
> Technically it would be the simplest, but there's a process for policy
> changes that's more involved than writing emails to d-devel. I'm
> suggesting you engage with it on this topic if you want the results of
> your work to be usable in Debian.
Speaking as a Policy E
Hi Stephan,
Quoting Stephan Lachnit (2022-02-08 18:53:22)
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:39 PM Jonas Smedegaard
> wrote:
> >
> > I am sceptical towards this proposal.
> >
> > An important feature to me with current machine-readable format is
> > that really it is machine-and-human-readable.
>
> Th
Technically it would be the simplest, but there's a process for policy changes
that's more involved than writing emails to d-devel. I'm suggesting you
engage with it on this topic if you want the results of your work to be usable
in Debian.
Scott K
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 1:27:19 PM EST
The easy solution would just be allow both. Either only a single file with
verbatim text or an SPDX document with licenses in a separate folder.
Regards,
Stephan
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022, 19:12 Scott Kitterman, wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 12:53:22 PM EST Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> > On Tue, F
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 12:53:22 PM EST Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:00 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Since Debian policy requires verbatim copies of licenses (or links to
> > /usr/
> > share/common-licenses), I think any policy compliant debian/copyright will
> > have to
Hi Jonas,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:39 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> I am sceptical towards this proposal.
>
> An important feature to me with current machine-readable format is that
> really it is machine-and-human-readable.
Thank you for your input! I'm aware of this concern, however I think
i
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> However, there's no easy way to identify what are the most popular ideas
> of improvements that Debian ought to make. We know of the
> "grow-your-ideas" project on Salsa, but it's far from exhaustive:
I spent a couple of hours to put my own wis
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
> what are — according to you — the most important projects/improvements
> that Debian ought to make. You can share your ideas here by replying to
> this email, but it would be inte
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:39:36 AM EST Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Stephan Lachnit (2022-01-26 12:49:34)
>
> > - What is an SPDX bill of materials?
> > It is a machine-readable format that specifies the licenses of each
> > file in tag/value style like DEP-5. However compared to DEP-5
Quoting Stephan Lachnit (2022-01-26 12:49:34)
> - What is an SPDX bill of materials?
> It is a machine-readable format that specifies the licenses of each
> file in tag/value style like DEP-5. However compared to DEP-5 it is
> much less human readable, i.e. it includes much more meta information,
>
Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
> I fully expect such a service to have an API that can be used to build
> a command line interface for people like you.
Yep, but I already don't use the various things like that for e.g. salsa
or github because it's too much hassle to set up for too little
benefit. Sim
On Tue, 08 Feb 2022, David Bremner wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
> > We should have a single web service that is able to handle all those
> > workflows and provide all the inputs that each team needs to make their
> > decision. It should have a nifty web interface (including with
> > authent
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
> what are — according to you — the most important projects/improvements
> that Debian ought to make. You can share your ideas here by replying to
> this email, but it would be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: handsome_feng
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, jianfen...@ubuntukylin.com
* Package name: ukui-notebook
Version : 3.1.0
Upstream Author : lixin
* URL : https://github.com/ukui/ukui-notebooks
* License : GPL-3
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> We should have a single web service that is able to handle all those
> workflows and provide all the inputs that each team needs to make their
> decision. It should have a nifty web interface (including with
> authentication and restricted access for embargoed security u
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
> what are — according to you — the most important projects/improvements
> that Debian ought to make. You can share your ideas here by replying to
> this email, but it would be
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> That's where you come into play: it would be nice if you could share
> what are — according to you — the most important projects/improvements
> that Debian ought to make. You can share your ideas here by replying to
> this email, but it would be
Hello everybody,
I don't have the time to keep samba, cifs-utils and [related] packages
in good shape, and I don't use it anymore as file server or AD/DC (I
only use it as domain member and cifs client).
[related]
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-samba-maint%40lists.alioth.debian.or
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 8:23:36 AM EST Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:39:09AM -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> > Various people have different reactions to and opinions about the
> > necessity of this review, which I understand and which is great for
> > broadening the discussi
Am Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:39:09AM -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>
> Various people have different reactions to and opinions about the
> necessity of this review, which I understand and which is great for
> broadening the discussion. But I feel like we're starting to lose track
> of my original poi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ana Custura
* Package name: golang-gitlab-yawning-edwards25519-extra
Version : 0.0~git20211229.2f91fcc-1
Upstream Author : Yawning Angel
* URL : https://gitlab.com/yawning/edwards25519-extra
* License : BSD-3
Programmi
31 matches
Mail list logo
