Re: Seeking feedback on a meta package builder

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:26 AM Helmut Grohne wrote: > Here are a number of lock-ins I happen to know: This was mentioned on IRC: cowpoke (from devscripts) -> remote cowbuilder -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Seeking feedback on a meta package builder

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:26 AM Helmut Grohne wrote: > When someone writes a tool, that happens to build packages as part of > its job (the earlier list), typically one of the build tools (the second > list) is chosen and fixed. It's not like you can mix and match them. > Here are a number of lock

Bug#989299: ITP: openarc -- Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) milter

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Bürgin X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: openarc Version : 1.0.0~beta3 Upstream Author : The Trusted Domain Project * URL : https://github.com/trusteddomainproject/OpenARC * License : BSD-2

Re: debhelper upstream should correct the perl from "use v5.24;" into "use v5.28;".

On Sun, 2021-05-30 at 10:13 +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > Hi Sérgio, > > On 27.05.21 13:14, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 20:05 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > > debhelper-devel ML doesn't exist anymore, please let me know if I > > > should report this in other place . >