Re: About lintian

2021-04-02 Thread Felix Lechner
Dear Norbert, On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 5:02 AM Norbert Preining wrote: > > you said you have plans to set up a test version of the Lintian web > application on non-Debian infrastructure. How is that going, Felix? A beta version of Lintian's new service is now live at lintian.debian.*net*. [1] The

Processed: reassign 986292 to command-not-found

2021-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 986292 command-not-found Bug #986292 [general] general: sqlite3 problem when a command is not available Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'command-not-found'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #986292 to the same valu

Bug#986295: ITP: r-bioc-ballgown -- Flexible, isoform-level differential expression analysis

2021-04-02 Thread Nilesh Patra
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nilesh Patra X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nil...@debian.org * Package name: r-bioc-ballgown Version : 2.22.0+dfsg Upstream Author : Jack Fu * URL : https://bioconductor.org/packages/ballgown * License : A

Bug#986292: general: sqlite3 problem when a command is not available

2021-04-02 Thread m
Package: general Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: noadr...@hotmail.com Everytime a command is not available, this comes up. command-not-found version: 0.3 Python version: 3.9.1 final 0 Distributor ID: Kali Description:Kali GNU/Linux Rolling Release:2021.1 Codename: kali-rolling E

Bug#986288: ITP: poke -- GNU poke, an interactive, extensible binary editor

2021-04-02 Thread Hilko Bengen
Package: wnpp Owner: Hilko Bengen Severity: wishlist * Package name: poke Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Jose E. Marchesi * URL or Web page : https://www.jemarch.net/poke * License : GPL-3+ Description : GNU poke, an interactive, extensible binary editor

Re: Questioning debian/upstream/signing-key.asc

2021-04-02 Thread Guillem Jover
[ CCing Daniel. ] On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:31:16 +0100, Ansgar wrote: > On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 09:06 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I'm not all that familiar with the intended semantics of OpenPGP key > > expirations, but intuitively I think a signature made before the > > expiration should be cons

Re: Questioning debian/upstream/signing-key.asc

2021-04-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! [ Ccing Daniel, as he proposed the shipping of upstream signatures, so leaving full context. ] On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 10:13:25 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > a few days ago, I ran uscan on a package where I knew there was a new > upstream version - just to encounter an validation error sinc