On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 10:18 AM Gard Spreemann wrote:
> Phil Morrell writes:
>
> > Sounds like you're asking for a new github redirector on qa.debian.org
> > as there is for sf.net, which could use the official api for stability.
FTR there is one of those here:
https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/fake
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:15 PM Timo Röhling wrote:
> It's the same for me: the only package I maintain where upstream signs their
> releases is the package where I am also the author. And I really don't think
> that it provides any additional value for Debian in this particular
> constellation; I
> In the latter, we should all
>diverge away (more than was already done) from the FSF and lead the Free
>Software movement without the FSF.
I take it that this probably involves Organisations like SPI, who consider it
ok to foster platforms like Zoom, or even worse like LPI, who consider it ok
Has anyone tried asking github if they are willing to specify and
support a stable interface (maybe even revert this change for the time
being). It's quite a big deal when they change these things,
especially just before a stable release.
Having a reliable way to check the current release version
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:38:57PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This breaks at least all Debian Med packages refereing to Github and
> probably way more. This means our toolset will fail to detect new
> upstream versions.
>
> Any idea what to do (besides uploading all packages obtained from
> Gi
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, Otto Kek?l?inen wrote:
Hello!
I've noticed I've spent quite a lot of time debugging various
situations where the debian/control definitions for
depends/breaks/replaces/conflicts/provides are not optimal.
The waste of time is two-fold:
1) apt is not verbose enough
2) the c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nilesh Patra
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nil...@debian.org
* Package name: fastani
Version : 1.32-1
Upstream Author : Georgia Institute of Technology
* URL : https://github.com/ParBLiSS/FastANI
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nilesh Patra
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nil...@debian.org
* Package name: r-cran-genoplotr
Version : 0.8.11
Upstream Author : Lionel Guy
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=genoPlotR
* License :
Le vendredi, 26 mars 2021, 16.01:14 h CET Timothy M Butterworth a écrit :
> The FSF with out RMS would be like the Linux Foundations with out
> Linus.
I'm quite sure the Linux Foundation will work just fine without Linus
Torvalds, and will one day have to.
My hope is that the same goes for the F
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 12:26:29PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 07:38:17AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:43:27PM +0100, Yadd wrote:
> > > Le 26/03/2021 à 22:38, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > > > Any idea what to do (besides uploading
Hi Bart,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 07:38:17AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:43:27PM +0100, Yadd wrote:
> > Le 26/03/2021 à 22:38, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > > Any idea what to do (besides uploading all packages obtained from
> > > Github right after the release)?
> >
> >
Phil Morrell writes:
> Sounds like you're asking for a new github redirector on qa.debian.org
> as there is for sf.net, which could use the official api for stability.
This got me thinking: the version checking mechanism of d/watch files is
useless if the outside world changes, i.e. if upstream
On 2021-03-26 Christoph Biedl wrote:
> a few days ago, I ran uscan on a package where I knew there was a new
> upstream version - just to encounter an validation error since the
> keys in debian/upstream/signing-key.asc had expired.
[...]
> Another about 40 distinct keys will expire within the nex
13 matches
Mail list logo
