On 2021/02/10 23:51, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> creating
> build/temp.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.9/Src
> compile options: '-Ibuild/src.linux-x86_64-3.9/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.9/Src
> -I/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/numpy/core/include -I/usr/include/python3
Jonathan Carter dijo [Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 07:29:14PM +0200]:
> >> Define "proper Unix"...
> >
> > The definition depends on whether you are a longhair or shorthair.
>
> If you're a proper blue-haired person, then the only proper Unix is Debian.
Please do note that your definition might be of su
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:15:38AM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Julian Gilbey (2021-02-10 22:51:39)
> > I wonder if anyone has an idea about this thorny problem. I'm trying
> > to create a package and thought I'd got something wrong, but have
> > found the sam
Hi,
Quoting Julian Gilbey (2021-02-10 22:51:39)
> I wonder if anyone has an idea about this thorny problem. I'm trying
> to create a package and thought I'd got something wrong, but have
> found the same behaviour happens with the "amp" package (version
> 0.6.1-1) and the "spherepack" package (ve
I wonder if anyone has an idea about this thorny problem. I'm trying
to create a package and thought I'd got something wrong, but have
found the same behaviour happens with the "amp" package (version
0.6.1-1) and the "spherepack" package (version 3.3~a1-4), which
suggests to me that the problem li
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:02:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk writes:
>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:13:10PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
users on shared systems can expect it to be available without asking
an administrator first. To me, locat
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:02:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:13:10PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> >>...
> >> users on
> >> shared systems can expect it to be available without asking an
> >> administrator
> >> first. To me, locate has
Quoting Niels Thykier (2021-02-10 17:35:36)
> Russ Allbery:
> > Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> >
> >> Let's see if Debian can agree on a single normalization of 822-ish
> >> files. For starters, I disagree that "wrap-and-sort -a" is a
> >> suitable normalization, as that will involve re-indentatio
On 2021/02/10 15:16, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes:
>>> As it's 2021 and 99% of the Linux user base has no idea what UNIX (or Linux)
>>> is, maybe it's time for a src:proper-unix-system package for those who care?
>>
>> Define "proper Unix"...
>
> The definition depends on whether you
Russ Allbery:
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
>> Let's see if Debian can agree on a single normalization of 822-ish
>> files. For starters, I disagree that "wrap-and-sort -a" is a suitable
>> normalization, as that will involve re-indentation when keys change.
>> Instead, I propose this as starting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Faustin Lammler
* Package name: golang-github-pkg-diff
Version : 0.0~git20200914.5b29258-1
Upstream Author : Josh Bleecher Snyder
* URL : https://github.com/pkg/diff
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Desc
On 2021-02-09 22:12:31 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> "Steinar H. Gunderson" writes:
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:16:29PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Furthermore, any mechanism they use to configure one of them
> >> (e.g. for privacy or performance reasons) will not control the other,
> >> and again
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > As it's 2021 and 99% of the Linux user base has no idea what UNIX (or Linux)
> > is, maybe it's time for a src:proper-unix-system package for those who care?
> Define "proper Unix"...
well, I'd leave this to the people who care.
B
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 13:38 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Define "proper Unix"...
A system including Emacs. So we would need emacs at Priority: standard
or even important or required :]
Ansgar
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:21:36PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> > I happen to disagree. To me this is yet another step away from being a
>> > proper Unix system - to something else. Which would be fine if it
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:21:36PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > I happen to disagree. To me this is yet another step away from being a
> > proper Unix system - to something else. Which would be fine if it moved
> > us forward.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> I happen to disagree. To me this is yet another step away from being a
> proper Unix system - to something else. Which would be fine if it moved
> us forward.
As it's 2021 and 99% of the Linux user base has no idea what UNIX (or Linux
Marvin Renich writes:
> * Steinar H. Gunderson [210209 14:27]:
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:53:10PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> > And there are now also many non-technical Linux users who have never
>> > used a shell.
>>
>> Well, why do we include netcat, telnet or hdparm? lsof? pciutils?
>> t
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:47:12AM +, Phil Morrell wrote:
> To make that work as a default, there would need to be something like an
> --short-preferred-unless-existing-indent
sorry, going by the current default, that should be
--align-preferred-unless-existing-short
signature.asc
Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kartik Mistry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, kar...@debian.org
* Package name: apertium-fra-frp
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Apertium Project Management Committee
* URL : https://www.apertium.org/
* License
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:49:51PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 2/9/21 7:40 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> >> Let's see if Debian can agree on a single normalization of 822-ish
> >> files. For starters, I disagree that "wrap-and-sort -a" is a suitable
> >> normalizati
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes:
> Z> isenkram-cli
>
> OK, but it seems to work differently that what I was thinking.
I assume you are talking about isenkram-autoinstall-firmware? How so?
Perhaps the documentation could be improved to adjust the expectations,
or event the program could be adjusted...
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 08:31:43AM +, Paul Sutton wrote:
> ... I had never heard of that one, these tools need to be better known.
If Enrico Zini's and Enrico Rossi's 'debtags' is installed, then try
this command:
debtags search hardware::detection
That makes the tools better known.
Add
Z> isenkram-cli
OK, but it seems to work differently that what I was thinking.
On 10/02/2021 06:31, Zlatan wrote:
There is isenkram-cli which can detect and autoinstall the needed firmware.
Z
Ah thanks for this, I had never heard of that one, these tools need
to be better known.
Also vrms, lists any non-free software installed it may help anyone who
wants to k
On Lu, 08 feb 21, 23:13:10, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> The downside is, of course, the nightly updatedb job, which it is rare that
> anyone will notice, and the space used.
That's assuming the system is left running over night. It might be
noticeable if run on next system start.
Kind rega
On Mi, 10 feb 21, 12:24:20, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:58:39PM -0500, Marvin Renich wrote:
> > These have come to be expected to be on a typical Linux system by almost
> > every technically-knowledgeable Linux user. Locate does not satisfy
> > that criterion
> (I'm surp
27 matches
Mail list logo
