Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hu Feng
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : deepin-artwork
Version : 2018.10.9
Upstream Author : deepinzhangshuang
* URL : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/deepin-artwork
License : LGPL-3+
Pro
Hi Otto,
I rely on such helper utilities. Here I can list some recommendations.
On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 23:02 +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Do you have any tips about generic command-line coloring programs?
1. [diff-highlight] highlighting .diff/.patch files
located in package
git: /usr/s
On 2021-01-07, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 07.01.21 um 18:24 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and
>> arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386).
>>
>> The problem is, I have no idea what the diffoscope diff [2] means and
>> how I
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:02:24PM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Do you have any tips about generic command-line coloring programs?
The bat package provides a batcat program that'll add colour to a lot of
different file formats. There's some screenshots on the github page:
https://github.com/sha
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1184 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 207 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 06:24, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and
> arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386).
>
I'm hardly an expert in such things but it looks to me as if gcc is
ordering things differently between the
Hello!
Colorizing the command-line is an efficient way to make various output
more readable. In particular when browsing log files it helps hugely
if columns or certain key values are colorized.
For this type of use case there is ccze packaged in Debian[1].
Lesspipe[2] is also somewhat known. I l
Hello Mattia,
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 12:02PM +01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> IIRC, there *used to* be an actual problem way back in some program that
> couldn't handle the : in filenames, and that's why they are not present to
> this day. I argue that we could just put that : (or the %-encoded versi
[crossposting this to the reproducible-build mailing list. Please CC on
replies, as I'm not subscribed]
Am 07.01.21 um 18:24 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Hi,
as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and
arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386).
The problem is,
Hi,
as can be seen at [1], systemd does not build reproducibly on armhf and
arm64 (while there is no problem on amd64 and i386).
The problem is, I have no idea what the diffoscope diff [2] means and
how I can make the package build reproducibly everywhere or how I can
further investigate thi
10 matches
Mail list logo
