Bug#976805: ITP: imhex -- Hex Editor for Reverse Engineers

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mo Zhou X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: imhex Version : 1.5.0 * URL : https://github.com/WerWolv/ImHex * License : GPL-2.0 Programming Lang: C++ Description : Hex Editor for Reverse Engin

Bug#976804: ITP: golang-sslmate-go-pkcs12 -- Go library for encoding and decoding PKCS#12 files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: golang-sslmate-go-pkcs12 Version : 0.0~git20201103.57fc603 Upstream Author : SSLMate * URL : https://software.sslmate.com/src/go-pkcs12/ * License : BSD-3-Clause Progr

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

Thanks Paul, On 07/12/2020 21:19, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > >> I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware > > IIRC the Debian kernel team were planning on adding those to the > linux-firmware.git packaging. > If that is happening that so

Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware IIRC the Debian kernel team were planning on adding those to the linux-firmware.git packaging. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#976727: ITP: libpdb-redo -- Library containing shared code for the various programs in project PDB-REDO

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" * Package name: libpdb-redo Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Maarten L. Hekkelman * URL : https://github.com/PDB-REDO/libpdb-redo * License : BSD-2-Clause Programming Lang: C++ Description

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

Thanks Vincent, On 07/12/2020 09:03, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 7 décembre 2020 08:57 -05, Mark Pearson: I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware & topology files being available on Debian - I know it's impacting a lot of users on some of the newer Thinkpads. I figured I should h

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

On 07/12/2020 11:13, Jonathan Carter wrote: On 2020/12/07 18:07, Mark Pearson wrote: I pushed what I have to https://salsa.debian.org/mpearson/sof-bin-packaging It's pretty basic :) Seems like you haven't committed go.sh? (and hopefully more files?) -Jonathan They're all in the upstream

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

On 2020/12/07 18:07, Mark Pearson wrote: > I pushed what I have to https://salsa.debian.org/mpearson/sof-bin-packaging > > It's pretty basic :) Seems like you haven't committed go.sh? (and hopefully more files?) -Jonathan -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://wiki.deb

Re: [External] Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

Thanks Jonathan, On 07/12/2020 10:15, Jonathan Carter wrote: Hi Mark On 2020/12/07 15:57, Mark Pearson wrote: I did a bit of reading this weekend, and started the process. Having created appropriate files under a debian sub-dir, and messed around a bit, now when running 'debuild -us -uc' from

Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

Hi Mark On 2020/12/07 15:57, Mark Pearson wrote: > I did a bit of reading this weekend, and started the process. Having > created appropriate files under a debian sub-dir, and messed around a > bit, now when running 'debuild -us -uc' from the 1.6 cloned branch of > the sof-bin git repo I end up wi

Re: Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

❦ 7 décembre 2020 08:57 -05, Mark Pearson: > I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware & topology > files being available on Debian - I know it's impacting a lot of users > on some of the newer Thinkpads. I figured I should have a stab at this > exercise myself and see what happens.

Intel SOF audio firmware packaging

Hi Debian, I'd like to solve the lack of Intel SOF audio firmware & topology files being available on Debian - I know it's impacting a lot of users on some of the newer Thinkpads. I figured I should have a stab at this exercise myself and see what happens. I did a bit of reading this weekend

Re: pcre2 10.35 (now 10.36) uploaded to experimental

Matthew Vernon writes: > I've uploaded 10.35-1 of pcre2 to experimental; I'll upload -2 to > unstable next weekend if there aren't any show-stoppers in the mean > time. > > We may yet see 10.36 out in time for it to get into bullseye (upstream > have an RC), but I wanted 10.35 in in case that doe

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bullseye

On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:03:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 12/1/20 5:02 AM, YunQiang Su wrote: > > I am sorry for the later response. > >Hi, > > > > I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend > > to continue this for the lifetime of the Bullseye release (

Bug#976714: ITP: age -- A simple, modern and secure encryption tool

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: nicoo X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: age Version : 1.0.0~beta5 Upstream Author : Filippo Valsorda * URL :

Re: dpkg-source reproducibility

On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 at 08:41:40 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > over all the years I had assumed the -x and -b operations of dpkg-source > are inverse, and the other way around as well. In other words, I > expected to rely on the following: > > Running "dpkg-source -x" on a .dsc, and then "dpk

Bug#976705: ITP: netopeer2 -- server for implementing network configuration management

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ondřej Surý -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: netopeer2 Version : 1.1.39 Upstream Author : CESNET, z.s.p.o. * URL : https://github.com/CESNET/Netopeer2 * License : BSD-3-clause Programming

Bug#976703: ITP: vendorcheck -- Check that all your Go dependencies are properly vendored

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: vendorcheck Version : 0.0~git20160511.d6d54d1-1 Upstream Author : Filippo Valsorda * URL : https://github.com/FiloSottile/vendorcheck * License : MIT Programming Lang: