I understand that if I write my own shell scripts I maybe should use
command -v instead, but this is not for my own shell scripts, but for
compatibility with BSD and Mac.
Den mån 17 aug. 2020 kl 20:47 skrev Erik Gustafsson <
ekir.gustafs...@gmail.com>:
> I took Teemus very good suggestion and c
I took Teemus very good suggestion and changed [-a] to [-as] now :)
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debianutils/-/merge_requests/6/diffs#ed04ff4dabf1e2d4cd6b89136c2b24dec27ecca4_21_24
Is there anything more I should change?
Who can merge? :)
Den fre 14 aug. 2020 kl 16:07 skrev Simon McVittie :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: puppet-module-voxpupuli-posix-acl
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Vox Pupuli
* URL : https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-posix_acl
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Puppet
Descr
On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 15:50 +1200, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
> I propose that we restrict access to dmesg to users in group 'adm' like so:
>
> 1) CONFIG_SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT=y in the kernel.
> 2) Following changes to /bin/dmesg permissions in package 'util-linux'
> - Ownership changes to root:
On 2020-08-17 at 07:47, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:50:37PM +1200, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
>
>> 2) Following changes to /bin/dmesg permissions in package
>> 'util-linux'
>> - Ownership changes to root:adm
>> - Permissions changed to 0750 (-rwxr-x---)
>
> You
Hi
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:50:37PM +1200, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
> 2) Following changes to /bin/dmesg permissions in package 'util-linux'
> - Ownership changes to root:adm
> - Permissions changed to 0750 (-rwxr-x---)
You mean 0754?
> - Add cap_syslog capability to binary.
Can som
On 2020-08-17 at 07:42, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> And what would be the point of setting kernel.dmesg_restrict=0 al long
> as dmesg is still not world-executable?
As far as I'm aware, it is:
$ dlocate `which dmesg`
util-linux: /bin/dmesg
$ apt-cache policy util-linux
util-linux:
Installed: 2.36-
On Aug 17, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
> I propose that we restrict access to dmesg to users in group 'adm' like so:
>
> 1) CONFIG_SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT=y in the kernel.
Which is already the default for Debian.
> 2) Following changes to /bin/dmesg permissions in package 'util-linux'
> - Owners
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 12:29:13 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:21:37AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > The GNOME team intend to add an epoch to the babl and gegl libraries,
>
> Question: what about changing the package name instead, and doing a
> transition to a new libr
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 11:52:46 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:21:37AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > The GNOME team intend to add an epoch to the babl and gegl libraries
>
> Another option: as these libs are used only by gimp and gnome-photos
(for completeness: also va
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:21:37AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The GNOME team intend to add an epoch to the babl and gegl libraries,
…
> Historically, versions of these packages were shipped by the third-party
> deb-multimedia.org apt repository. That would have been fine, except that
> the main
hi,
debian-security-support | 2019.12.12~deb8u2 | jessie-security |
source, all
debian-security-support | 2020.06.21~deb9u1 | stretch |
source, all
debian-security-support | 2020.06.21~deb10u1 | buster |
source, all
debian-security-support | 202
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:21:37AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The GNOME team intend to add an epoch to the babl and gegl libraries,
> so I'm checking for consensus (Debian Policy §5.6.12.1). As usual with
> epochs, this is a bad situation that I am trying to mitigate as much as
> possible, rath
The GNOME team intend to add an epoch to the babl and gegl libraries,
so I'm checking for consensus (Debian Policy §5.6.12.1). As usual with
epochs, this is a bad situation that I am trying to mitigate as much as
possible, rather than anything elegant or exemplary.
babl and gegl are 2D image libra
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 01:44:14 -0300, Tiago Zaniquelli wrote:
> After [configuring unstable apt sources] I executed apt-update and apt
> full-upgrade, so after that show me
> that the "wicd" will removed, but I can't do that because if I do that I
> will lost the program that configure my WiFi.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
