Re: Bug#963101: cozy-audiobook-player: "Request For Package"

Control: reassign -1 wnpp Control: retitle -1 RFP: cozy-audiobook-player -- slick GUI audiobook player On Jo, 18 iun 20, 20:07:15, Randy Edwards wrote: > Package: cozy-audiobook-player > Version: "Request For Package > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > This is a request to package Cozy

Work-needing packages report for Jun 19, 2020

The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 1162 (new: 0) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 210 (new: 1) Total number of packages reques

Bug#963092: ITP: healpix-fortran -- HEALPix representation of spherical data - Fortran library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Leo Singer * Package name: healpix-fortran Version : 3.60 Upstream Author : Martin Reinecke * URL : http://healpix.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Programming Lang: Fortran Description : HEALPix representation of

Bug#963091: ITP: idevicerestore -- command-line application to restore firmware files to iOS devices

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: pkg-gtkpod-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net * Package name: idevicerestore Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : libimobiledevice project * URL : http://www.libimobiledevice.org/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Descripti

Bug#963078: ITP: paryfor: Parallel_for implementation based on atomic queues

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nilesh Patra X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: paryfor Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Erik Garrison * URL : https://github.com/ekg/paryfor * License : Expat

Bug#963076: ITP: lightgbm -- It is a gradient boosting framework that uses tree based learning algorithms. It is designed to be distributed and efficient

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Juri Grabowski * Package name: lightgbm Version : 2.3.1 Upstream Author : Guolin Ke Guolin Ke * URL : https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/lightgbm/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: C+

Bug#963047: ITP: ngmlr: CoNvex Gap-cost alignMents for Long Reads

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nilesh Patra X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: ngmlr Version : 0.2.7 Upstream Author : Philipp Rescheneder * URL : https://github.com/philres/ngmlr * License :

Bug#963042: ITP: libirecovery -- Library allowing communication with iBoot/iBSS of iOS devices via USB

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: gtkpod Maintainers * Package name: libirecovery Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : libimobiledevice project * URL : http://www.libimobiledevice.org/ * License : GPL/LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : Library al

Re: Lintian status reporting on packages overview broken?

On 2020-06-18 11:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 6/18/20 10:15 AM, mer...@debian.org wrote: >> In addition to that, "Watch" column displays dashes ("-") only. > That's due to #932296 Thanks a lot for the explanation! Best, Andrius

Re: Lintian status reporting on packages overview broken?

On 6/18/20 10:15 AM, mer...@debian.org wrote: > In addition to that, "Watch" column displays dashes ("-") only. That's due to #932296 Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Re: Lintian status reporting on packages overview broken?

Hi, On 2020-06-18 10:21, Gard Spreemann wrote: > It seems to me that the "Lintian E+W" column on the QA packages overview > page currently incorrectly shows a checkmark even when there are Lintian > warnings for a package. Is this a known bug? In addition to that, "Watch" column displays dashes (

BITTE BESTÄTIGEN SIE DIE MITTEILUNG

Achtung: Begünstigter, Möglicherweise verstehen Sie nicht, warum diese E-Mail zu Ihnen kam. Eine gemeinsame Sitzung der Vorstandsmitglieder der Weltbankgruppe mit dem Senatsausschuss für den Ausgleich und die Umsetzung von Auslandsschulden des Fonds für Begünstigte / Erbschaften der Kategorie E

Re: Lintian status reporting on packages overview broken?

Hi, Le jeudi 18 juin 2020 à 09:21 +0200, Gard Spreemann a écrit : > It seems to me that the "Lintian E+W" column on the QA packages > overview > page currently incorrectly shows a checkmark even when there are > Lintian > warnings for a package. Is this a known bug? I was about to ask around why

Lintian status reporting on packages overview broken?

Hello list, It seems to me that the "Lintian E+W" column on the QA packages overview page currently incorrectly shows a checkmark even when there are Lintian warnings for a package. Is this a known bug? Best, Gard signature.asc Description: PGP signature