On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 20:32 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 14/04/20 at 19:40 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > I think we should be rebuilding everything at least once per release
> > > cycle, so we don't have a nasty surprise when these "mature" packages
> > > need bug fixes.
> >
> > There's e
Hello,
On Tue 14 Apr 2020 at 10:54AM +02, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Guillem and I have debated this and come to a solution, which we believe
> will be able to address the concerns about the path being "hidden". It
> also enables us to simplify parts of the migration in some cases.
Thank you for you
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:45:55PM +0200, Markus Frosch wrote:
> > I would hence ask you to explain a bit better why you think APT is wrong
> > and provide an example which actually shows these characteristics.
> > Otherwise I will apparently be a tiny bit annoyed by this thread.
>
> Why so passiv
On 14/04/20 at 19:40 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > I think we should be rebuilding everything at least once per release
> > cycle, so we don't have a nasty surprise when these "mature" packages
> > need bug fixes.
>
> There's enough automated testing to spot FTBFS, thus rebuilding would only
> r
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:36:37PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 13:12 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Perhaps, but it is *also* documented that an upload just to bump the
> > Standards-Version is severely frowned upon. If there is no other reason
> > to upload in 7 years, t
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 13:12 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 09:11:57PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
[...]
> > One could expect from maintainers that they check their packages for
> > compliance regularly and that they document that.
>
> Perhaps, but it is *also* documented t
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 15:19 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Lets ignore for the moment that wordpress actually doesn't have the
> recommends line which is the TOPIC OF THE THREAD, but has instead a
> "Depends: apache2 | httpd" among other things (← hint hint):
>
> $ apt install wordpress nginx
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin
* Package name: python-pydiscourse
Version : v1.0.0
Upstream Author : Marc Sibson and contributors
* URL : https://github.com/bennylope/pydiscourse
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : P
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:26:54AM +0200, Markus Frosch wrote:
> Apparently this no longer works. When I install a package like nginx
> and then a package recommending a web server, APT will still try to
> install apache2.
>
> > apt install -y nginx
> > apt install wordpress
Lets ignore for the m
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 09:11:57PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 08:03:09PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >> Adam Borowski writes:
> >> > Idea: perhaps we could make no unrestricted (maintainer, team, or QA)
> >> > upload
> >> > for 10 years a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Ferraris
* Package name: feedbackd
Version : 0.0.0+git20200305
Upstream Author : Purism SPC
* URL : https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/feedbackd
* License : GPL-3+ and LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C
Description
Am 14.04.20 um 11:49 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 14.04.20 um 10:26 schrieb Markus Frosch:
>
>> What are your thoughts on that? Is there any other thread
>> discussing this? The current bugs for apt touching on virtual
>> package don't really mean this behavior.
>
> I can not reproduce your proble
Am 14.04.20 um 10:26 schrieb Markus Frosch:
> What are your thoughts on that? Is there any other thread
> discussing this? The current bugs for apt touching on virtual
> package don't really mean this behavior.
I can not reproduce your problem in a sid chroot.
When nginx (nginx-full to be precise
Sam Hartman:
> I'm concerned about a leading . at least for:
>
> * the debian/tmp replacement
> * the replacement for the package install directories under debian.
>
> I think that maintaining those directories such that ls shows them will
> be more friendly for new maintainers.
> So I'd prefer s
Hey all,
not sure if this has been discussed elsewhere, but I recently noticed
a change in APTs lookup for Recommends. Maybe also for other dependencies.
Many packages recommend a webserver like this:
> Recommends: apache2 | httpd
Apparently this no longer works. When I install a package like ng
15 matches
Mail list logo
