Bug#953761: ITP: golang-vbom-util -- Go utility packages

2020-03-12 Thread Tong Sun
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tong Sun * Package name: golang-vbom-util Version : 0.0~git20180919.efcd4e0-1 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/fvbommel/util * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description : Go utility packages G

Work-needing packages report for Mar 13, 2020

2020-03-12 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 1238 (new: 3) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 237 (new: 0) Total number of packages reques

Re: Seeking sponsor for new package

2020-03-12 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hi Fabrice, Thanks so much for your reply. This makes sense. I will try git-buildpackage, and I will move the source + debian packaging to a separate branch. Best, Aaron On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:28 PM Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote: > Hello Aaron, > > I'm a newbie in Debian packaging, but here is

Seeking sponsor for new package

2020-03-12 Thread Aaron Boxer
Hello! As you may have seen, I am interested in packaging my image compression library for debian: https://github.com/GrokImageCompression/grok I've tested the packaging locally and as far as I can tell, it's all working correctly. The only thing missing now is a properly updated copyright file.

Re: Packaging new library very similar to another library

2020-03-12 Thread Aaron Boxer
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:21 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:05:48PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > > > > > Besides the copyright file, I would like to test building the > > > package. > > > > > > What's the best way of doing this? I am on > > > > > > Ubuntu Eoan. Thanks

Re: Packaging new library very similar to another library

2020-03-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:05:48PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > > > > Besides the copyright file, I would like to test building the > > package. > > > > > What's the best way of doing this? I am on > > > > > Ubuntu Eoan. Thanks! > > > > Get a sid system (chroot is probably fine). Install and conf

Re: Packaging new library very similar to another library

2020-03-12 Thread Aaron Boxer
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:26 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:17:29PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:00 PM Andrey Rahmatullin > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:49:25PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > > > Besides the copyright file, I wo

Re: Packaging new library very similar to another library

2020-03-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:17:29PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:00 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:49:25PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > > Besides the copyright file, I would like to test building the package. > > > What's the best way of doi

Re: Packaging new library very similar to another library

2020-03-12 Thread Aaron Boxer
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:00 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:49:25PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > > Besides the copyright file, I would like to test building the package. > > What's the best way of doing this? I am on > > Ubuntu Eoan. Thanks! > Get a sid system (chroot i

Re: Packaging new library very similar to another library

2020-03-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:49:25PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote: > Besides the copyright file, I would like to test building the package. > What's the best way of doing this? I am on > Ubuntu Eoan. Thanks! Get a sid system (chroot is probably fine). Install and configure pbuilder or sbuild there. You

Re: Packaging new library very similar to another library

2020-03-12 Thread Aaron Boxer
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:38 PM Aaron Boxer wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:46 AM Sudip Mukherjee < > sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:29 PM Aaron Boxer wrote: >> > >> > Thanks, Sudip! I've made those changes, and renamed the library to >> grok-jpeg2000 >

Re: Idea: frontend tool for more efficient license reviewing based on tree-structured IR

2020-03-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Osamu Aoki (2020-03-12 14:52:24) > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 04:54:32PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Long description of debmake claims it "does more than what > > licensecheck(1) offers" but I am puzzled what that sentence means - > > more polished experience (even if less accurate),

Re: Idea: frontend tool for more efficient license reviewing based on tree-structured IR

2020-03-12 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 04:54:32PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Mo Zhou (2019-12-27 02:56:07) > > I created an amount of NEW packages as a DD, and reviewed an amount of > > NEW packages in the NEW queue as FTP trainee. > > Great. Also because your experience as FTP trainee sheds

Bug#953722: ITP: josm-installer -- Editor for OpenStreetMap (installer)

2020-03-12 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bas Couwenberg * Package name: josm-installer Version : 0.0.1+svn16006 Upstream Author : Bas Couwenberg * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/josm-installer * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Python Desc

Bug#953685: ITP: ruby-guard-rspec -- Guard gem for RSpec

2020-03-12 Thread kiran
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: hacksk X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : ruby-guard-rspec Version : 4.7.3 Upstream Author : 2010-2016 Thibaud Guillaume-Gentil * URL : https://github.com/guard/guard-rspec * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Gua