Bug#945756: ITP: golang-github-flynn-noise -- Go implementation of the Noise Protocol Framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christian Barcenas * Package name: golang-github-flynn-noise Version : 0.0~git20180327.2492fe1-1 Upstream Author : Flynn * URL : https://github.com/flynn/noise * License : BSD-3-Clause Programming Lang: Go Description

Bug#945750: ITP: golang-github-hashicorp-go-bexpr -- generic boolean expression evaluation in Golang

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Smirnov X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:consul Package name: golang-github-hashicorp-go-bexpr Version: 0.1.2 Upstream Author: HashiCorp License: MPL-2

Bug#945616: ITP: ruby-jekyll-mentions -- Jekyll plugin to add mentionable link support

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Leidert -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: ruby-jekyll-mentions Version : 1.5.1 Upstream Author : GitHub Inc. * URL : https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-mentions * License : MIT Progra

Re: udeb of rsync

On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 23:37 +, Samuel Henrique wrote: > Hello debian-devel, > > TL:DR; What are the drawbacks of providing an rsync udeb (and > am I right regarding the pros)? > > I would like to check in with you before moving on with this feature > request. > > rsync: Please provide an rsy

Re: udeb of rsync

On Nov 27, Samuel Henrique wrote: > TL:DR; What are the drawbacks of providing an rsync udeb (and You package will be frozen for a longer time before a release. The technical part is not hard, you just have to build the package twice: have a look at kmod for a good example. -- ciao, Marco s

Bug#945570: ITP: prometheus-openstack-exporter -- Prometheus exporter for openstack

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez * Package name: prometheus-openstack-exporter Version : 0.1.4 Upstream Author : Jacek Nykis , Laurent Sesques , Paul Collins * URL : https://github.com/CanonicalLt