Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hiroki Kumazaki
* Package name: libsxg
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : KUMAZAKI, Hiroki
* URL : https://github.com/google/libsxg
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : Signed HTTP Exchan
Richard Laager writes:
> If someone is working with both unstable and experimental, then they
> must use two branches to differentiate them. DEP-14 says to do so with
> debian/experimental for experimental. So far, so good. For unstable,
> DEP-14 says to use debian/sid or debian/unstable. Why no
On 11/5/19 9:51 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Richard Laager writes:
>> I'd love to see more information about a recommended branch
>> structure. FWIW, I've been using branches named for each release
>> (e.g. "sid" is the default, but I also have "buster" for a (proposed)
>> stable update, will
Richard Laager writes:
> This all looks very good.
>
> Presumably the repository / Salsa project name should match the source
> package name? If so, that might be good to note, at least as the
> default.
>
I'm curious what other people think about this point, because it could
cause a lot of chur
Sam Hartman writes:
> General Recommendation
> ==
> [...]
> You should document the branch format (such as patches unapplied (gbp
> pq)) that your repository uses. Best practice for documenting this is
> still evolving. The best current option is to document your branch
> fo
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 02:34:13 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I'm planning to add warnings for 1.0 formats when using a version that
> does not match the type of tarball found. Ideally 1.0 formats would
> error out in the same way 3.0 do, but this is impractical, and I guess
> we'll just have to wai
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 10:45:49AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Thomas Goirand:
> > I've setup my new laptop with secureboot, and now, I can't use the DKMS
> > modules from Virtualbox, as they aren't signed. I've been told by Sledge
> > that I should use MOK to do that, and that DKMS packages
On Di, Nov 05, 2019 at 05:45:34 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
Simon Richter writes:
Yes, that's one of the questions I have asked: is systemd a core
system component that we want to provide a stable release for, or is
it one of the peripheral packages that users can upgrade to
a backported version if t
Simon Richter writes:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 07:40:52PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> There's no need to do that. If a backported package is using such
>> features, then it just should depend on the correct version of systemd.
>> You may have seen that systemd 242 is already in buster-backport
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 07:40:52PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> There's no need to do that. If a backported package is using such
> features, then it just should depend on the correct version of systemd.
> You may have seen that systemd 242 is already in buster-backports...
Yes, that's one
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:18:19PM +0100, Christian Quentin wrote:
> * when I ask Debian to stop (from Gnome), the shutdown sequence seems to
> follow
> the usual steps, the a blank screen appears.The screen is not completely off.
> The PC does not power-off.
> * As the PC does not stop, I have to
Hi Emfox and folks,
I've uploaded erofs-utils package to mentors.debian.net
https://mentors.debian.net/package/erofs-utils
with a RFS request #944153 , please kindly take some time
helping on this package (and new filesystem) it will of
great help. Thanks in advance!
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
12 matches
Mail list logo
