Em sáb, 2019-08-17 às 07:24 +0200, Geert Stappers escreveu:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:14:12AM -0300, Anderson Ribeiro [ MAD ]
> wrote:
> > Good evening to all.
> > Guys, I'm studying packaging.
> > Because I am learning.
> >
> > I am trying to package it (Pulseaudio-version-12.99.2).
> > In the
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:14:12AM -0300, Anderson Ribeiro [ MAD ] wrote:
> Good evening to all.
> Guys, I'm studying packaging.
> Because I am learning.
>
> I am trying to package it (Pulseaudio-version-12.99.2).
> In the COPYRIGTH
> version is as follows.
>
> Copyrigth 2018-2019 Pali Rohár
>
>
Good evening to all.
Guys, I'm studying packaging.
Because I am learning.
I am trying to package it (Pulseaudio-version-12.99.2).
In the COPYRIGTH
version is as follows.
Copyrigth 2018-2019 Pali Rohár
PulseAudio is free software; you can redistribute
it and / or modify
under the terms of the GN
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:30:07 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > > I don't see any reason for calling this action itself foolish.
> And as I said, you will always find ways to ddos a service (that does not
> mean the user was foolish, intended to d
On 2019-08-15 12:22:58 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> I've read that this year, there was some efforts to add Gitlab
> support to Zuul. I don't know what the status is though, but I
> know that it's possible to add Gerrit in front, and then have
> Gerrit plugged to Zuul.
[...]
While
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> I am a bit surprised, from the first day on we said that there are limited
> ressources for ci and that you should be nice to the service. Thats even
> documented:
>
> "We mean that. Really. Be nice to the server. At some point in the future we
> hope
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Regardless of anything they are doing with Git, maintainers of a package
> are expected to process patches sent to the BTS.
Yes.
> You cannot respond to a patch telling someone they need to file a merge
> request to have it considered.
I would not hesita
Quoting Simon McVittie (2019-08-16 11:00:37)
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 00:13:28 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Are you arguing that an installation where in-memory storage of
> > config is fine is perhaps not an "unusual installation" but a
> > "very super dooper weird installations" and t
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jonathan Carter writes:
>
> > The Debian QA DDPO pages will show you whether you have MRs on the same
> > page where you see how many open bugs, RC bugs, lintian errors, etc you
> > have. This makes it super easy to notice MRs when doing routine checks
>
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > From what I know, this what not a "foolish user action" but an action
> > by a dedicated maintainer who enabled salsa-ci for all packages
> > ("projects") of a specific team; so they used a servi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
* Package name: janest-ocaml-compiler-libs
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : Jane Street Group, LLC
* URL : https://github.com/janestreet/ocaml-compiler-libs
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: OCa
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, Simon McVittie wrote:
> If there *is* consensus that "don't lose user configuration" is less
> important than "weaken dependencies where possible", then that's a good
> reason to weaken the dependency, although in practice that is likely to
> be wontfix until dh_installgsetting
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 00:13:28 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Are you arguing that an installation where in-memory storage of config
> is fine is perhaps not an "unusual installation" but a "very super
> dooper weird installations" and therefore does not match Debian Policy
> about using
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, gregor herrmann wrote:
> From what I know, this what not a "foolish user action" but an action
> by a dedicated maintainer who enabled salsa-ci for all packages
> ("projects") of a specific team; so they used a service advertised by
> the salsa and salsa-ci teams. That thi
Hi,
Le 15/08/2019 à 16:38, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 20:25:05 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
>> The Debian QA DDPO pages will show you whether you have MRs
[…]
> I don't see any MRs there
You need to look for (or grep) the exclamation marks (yay, discrete).
> https://qa.deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
* Package name: ppxlib
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Jane Street Group, LLC
* URL : https://github.com/ocaml-ppx/ppxlib
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : meta-programming fo
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 16.08.2019, 08:58 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wirt:
> > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> [..]
> > > From what I know, this what not a "foolish user action" but an action
> > > by a dedicated maintainer who enabled salsa-ci fo
Am Freitag, den 16.08.2019, 08:58 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wirt:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, gregor herrmann wrote:
[..]
> > From what I know, this what not a "foolish user action" but an action
> > by a dedicated maintainer who enabled salsa-ci for all packages
> > ("projects") of a specific team; so t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Apollon Oikonomopoulos
* Package name: beanstalkc
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Andreas Bolka
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : simple beanstalkd cli
19 matches
Mail list logo
