Re: AMDGPU+OpenCL with Debian?

On 2019-06-18 03:15, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Same here... with WXX100 cards. > what about rocm packaging ? Not easy. Involves a toolchain. Is ROCm promising enough to challenge CUDA? (Although ROCm has already beaten CUDA in terms of license). Both tensorflow and pytorch supports ROCm. I

Re: AMDGPU+OpenCL with Debian?

Hi, Am 17.06.19 um 21:15 schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel: > Same here... with WXX100 cards. > what about rocm packaging ? (I'm not using an AMD graphic card but ...) there was recently a new article added to the Debian wiki regarding this topic about using the official AMDGPU driver. Maybe this

RE:AMDGPU+OpenCL with Debian?

Same here... with WXX100 cards. what about rocm packaging ? De : Steffen Möller [steffen_moel...@gmx.de] Envoyé : lundi 17 juin 2019 20:14 À : debian-devel@lists.debian.org Objet : AMDGPU+OpenCL with Debian? Hello, Running Debian unstable, I failed to set

AMDGPU+OpenCL with Debian?

Hello, Running Debian unstable, I failed to set up OpenCL to work with BOINC and an AMD RX580. The card worked just fine with the monitor, but it was not recognised as an OpenCL device by BOINC. When I then tried to install the 19.10 release of the driver AMD provides on https://www.amd.com/en/su

Re: The Difference between debcheckout and dgit and what they try to accomplish

Hi, Let me try to answer multiple mails as one: On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 07:44:39AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > In other words: If vcs-git would be uniform would this be more > attractive to you? Maybe. Uniformity certainly is an important property to me. Having to figure out different workflow

W sprawie zlecenia

Dzień dobry, zajmujemy się budową: - profesjonalnych - nowoczesnych - responsywnych *Stron i Sklepów* Internetowych. Jeśli chcieliby Państwo otrzymać bezpłatną, niezobowiązującą propozycję dla Państwa firmy w tym zakresie prosimy o odpowiedź * Tak* na ten e-mail. _ Z poważaniem,

W nawiązaniu do Sklepu

Dzień dobry, reprezentuję firmę zajmującą się tworzeniem nowoczesnych *_Stron i Sklepów_* WWW. Z przyjemnością podeślę naszą aktualną propozycję w tym zakresie. Jeżeli mogę, proszę o e-mail zwrotny o treści *TAK.* _ _ _ Z poważaniem, Andrzej Mysiński Strony i Sklepy WWW

Re: The Difference between debcheckout and dgit and what they try to accomplish

Sean Whitton writes ("Re: The Difference between debcheckout and dgit and what they try to accomplish"): > It would seem, then, that what we want is merge requests against our > interchange format: the source packages that actually get uploaded. Or, > in other words, we want merge requests agains

Re: The Difference between debcheckout and dgit and what they try to accomplish

Sam Hartman writes ("Re: The Difference between debcheckout and dgit and what they try to accomplish"): > But my reading of the discussion so far is that people see getting > patches actually integrated as a pain point. ... > In the debian-vote discussion people were talking about a eutopia where

Re: The Difference between debcheckout and dgit and what they try to accomplish

Hello, On Sun 16 Jun 2019 at 08:08pm -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > Dgit absolutely can be used to prepare a bunch of patches. But unless > the maintainer actually uses dgit, it's not clear that the result is > easier for the maintainer to merge than a well submitted patch via the > bts produced fr

Re: Missing package in Debian Buster "evolution-ews"

On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 11:13 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2019-06-17 09:56, Ronald Jaeckel wrote: > > The only package I've missed was evolution-ews. It's not in the > > repositories anymore. So I took the package from sid and it worked > > for > > me. My question is: Will be the package evolut

Re: The Difference between debcheckout and dgit and what they try to accomplish

On 17.06.19 06:53, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Whether I use apt-get source and debdiff or dgit > and git format-patch is a detail on my side. out of curiosity (and because i usually quite enjoy your patches): do you do use dgit in *your* workflow? fgmadsr IOhannes

Re: Missing package in Debian Buster "evolution-ews"

On 2019-06-17 09:56, Ronald Jaeckel wrote: The only package I've missed was evolution-ews. It's not in the repositories anymore. So I took the package from sid and it worked for me. My question is: Will be the package evolution-ews integrated in Buster before the official release? No, the packa

Bug#930638: ITP: gla11y -- Automatic check of accessibility of .ui files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Samuel Thibault * Package name: gla11y Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Samuel Thibault * URL : https://github.com/hypra/gla11y * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : Automatic check of accessibili

Missing package in Debian Buster "evolution-ews"

Dear development team, I tested Debian Buster RC1 with success. Good work so far! The only package I've missed was evolution-ews. It's not in the repositories anymore. So I took the package from sid and it worked for me. My question is: Will be the package evolution-ews integrated in Buster b

Bug#930635: ITP: node-immutable -- Immutable Data Collections

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Control: block 930634 by -1 * Package name : node-immutable Version : 3.8.2 Upstream Author : Lee Byron (https://github.com/leebyron) * URL : https://facebook.github.com/immutable-js * License :